|
|
|
 |
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:44 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
Endoperez said:
Quote:
Cainehill said:(Kind of disheartening to read that PD has actually been nerfed even more, vis a vis Jotuns and whatnot. )
|
It hasn't been nerfed per se. Jotunheim provincial defense is weaker now, but not because it was made weaker, but because larger armies are more common and they are one of the nations whose province defence wasn't boosted. They might not be one of the nations with very good PD any more.
|
From what people have posted, Jotunheim gets only 1/2 a troop per point of PD, that's half what they got in Dom2. I call that nerfed, wouldn't you?
__________________
Wormwood and wine, and the bitter taste of ashes.
|

October 19th, 2006, 06:28 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Near Paris, France
Posts: 1,566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Well PD is not much more effective than in Dom2, *but* you usually have more money to invest in, so whereas in Dom2 we put either 2 or 11 PD, it's now rather 11 or 21+.
So small raiding armies can be stopped, but as armies are larger also it's more or less the same, unless vs spells that didn't "rescale" such as Calls ..
But, and that's my point  , now stealthy scouts and armies are much more easily detected and defeated.
IMHO that's the real change : I wasn't very fond of stealthy strategies in D2 but now they're even weaker...
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:09 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
bleach168 said:
I'm playing Pythium and I have lots of money so I invest in PD usually up to 50-60 in provinces bordering my enemies.
|
Some nations such as Pythium have weak province defense and some nations such as Jotun have very powerful province defense. The main reason I stopped playing Machaka was because their province defense had me losing provinces deep inside my territory to little weak spells like call of the winds. On a map of 400+ provinces it's unrealistic to place troops and commanders in all provinces for spells like 'call of the winds'. Sure eventually a global spell can be casted to help, yet I'd rather be investing my gems in an offensive strategy instead of placing a band-aid on some weakness in the nation.
Hopefully we'll see some improvements with province defense in the upcoming patches.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:22 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
NTJedi said:
The main reason I stopped playing Machaka was because their province defense had me losing provinces deep inside my territory to little weak spells like call of the winds.
Hopefully we'll see some improvements with province defense in the upcoming patches.
|
PD was changed already. Jotunheim, as an example, gets just few giants. Other nations get lots of (often weak) troops.
Commander at def 1: Machaka Chief
Units at def 1+: 3xMachaka Militia, Machaka Warrior
Commander at def 20: Machaka Commander
Units at def 20+: Machaka Hoplite
Stronger than it used to, but still quite weak. However, you can afford to buy more province defense. You might be forced to go a big higher with Machaka than you would with other nations, but you have Heat 2 for extra points. 60 units you get from PD 15 should rout a Call of the Winds.
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:28 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Thanks for the info Endoperez... I might give Machaka another try.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:46 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
For Border provinces i try to go pd20, maybe as high as 30-40 if its very important or i have no army near. As a general rule of thumb i try to place one recruited archer/crossbow in a province (atleast) for each point of pd. I add battle mages if i have cheap mages with great spells (any nation with e2+ is good(as are many others), summon earthpower, spam bladewind) because, while you often want them with your main armies the sort of damage they can do is amazing (nether bolts, bladewind, falling frost/fires, a few of the clouds ect)
|

October 19th, 2006, 04:54 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: High PD kinda useless.
Quote:
NTJedi said:Thanks for the info Endoperez... I might give Machaka another try.
|
Thank Bruce. That's from the manual. You know, from the nation lists. All the PDs are listed there. And all the castles they build on various terrains are listed there.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|