|
|
|
|
|
December 16th, 2005, 01:57 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
temp dibs on ulm ;p
|
December 16th, 2005, 02:43 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
I think I may already have it, arch. Got three copies of shahrivar for some reason already? One of them is probably good but I'll let you know if otherwise.
As for a hosting schedule I was thinking 24hr QH for the first couple of weeks. Then move to maybe like midnight every day or other day? Never tried those options but I like the idea of consistency for it (assuming it operates like I hope it does?).
|
December 16th, 2005, 02:44 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
In other news, I'm going to downgrade research from Very Hard -> Hard. It was pointed out to me that V. Hard research favors blood more and I'm pretty tired of blood dominating.
|
December 16th, 2005, 03:39 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
if it goes to 2 days after not too long that would be good for me.
there are a couple errors in the shah_rev that need to be fixed - steel swamps is misspelled, standing stones (?) is missing? maybe one "jumping neighbour" in the south.
also i'm not sure about those two conjuration sites, esp. in such a high gem game. up to you.
|
December 16th, 2005, 05:42 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 660
Thanks: 63
Thanked 75 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
I'll take Arcos.
|
December 16th, 2005, 08:11 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
You got it.
I have to admit that I'm surprised no one has picked up Marignon or Mictlan. Both have good sets of artifacts. Caelum does too, really, since with Tempest it can fight full-bore from turn 1 almost.
|
December 16th, 2005, 11:12 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
if it wasnt for being obsessed with pythium and a little bored from over-playing mictain in sp games i would have picked one of those
|
December 16th, 2005, 12:09 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
Quote:
Ironhawk said:
You got it.
I have to admit that I'm surprised no one has picked up Marignon or Mictlan. Both have good sets of artifacts. Caelum does too, really, since with Tempest it can fight full-bore from turn 1 almost.
|
I've never played any of them so maybe I'll switch since I've played Pangaea plenty. Marignon looks fun. But how does the Knight attack from the Chalice work? Is it like an assassination attempt or a regular assault on a province? ANd how tough are the knights?
|
December 16th, 2005, 12:13 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
knights are horrors as order is to magic.
what I mean is, in provinces with order, knights attack more often (i believe) like how horrors attack in a magic dominion. Since I almost always choose termoil/luck combo, I have never once been attacked by a knight for my chalice.
|
December 16th, 2005, 12:20 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New MP Game - Artifact Game - open!!
I've already played one game on Shahrivar which had 1 water nation. I found it a little annoying that one nation has an uncontestable free ride in a nice handful of provinces for a long time. I request the there be either no water nations, or both - and the latter would make Shahrivar a poor choice. I actually wouldn't mind a shot at the World map, if the victory condition was changed from 70% of provinces to say 40%. Its been years since I played on World.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|