It's not just the recoil, it's the noise. The report actually has more to do with flinch. And yes, I am a shooter IRL.
As far as that "study", OMG what bull**** science.
Quote:
The groups didn't differ in accuracy or reaction time, but those who played the violent game showed more activity (brightly colored scans) in the amygdala. That is an area of the brain connected with emotional arousal.
|
And that proves exactly what? Hello? Just how does activity in the amygdala translate to violent realworld behavior? Obviously, it does not, which is why there's no
stated conclusion, only the cleverly
implied one...
Quote:
Dr. Vincent Mathews, an Indiana University radiology professor who led the study, said..."During tasks requiring concentration and processing of emotional stimuli, the adolescents who had played the violent video game showed distinct differences in brain activation than the adolescents who played an equally exciting and fun - but nonviolent - game,"
|
Oh, so "exciting" and "fun" are now scientific terms? Pray tell, just how were these properties quantified, measured, and compared, to determine that the non-violent games were "equally exciting and fun" ? And just how does being a radiologist (ffs!) qualify the good doctor for this study?
Furthermore, at no point are the terms "violent" and "non-violent" defined for purposes of this study. Is Madden Football non-violent? Hell, no. Is NASCAR racing non-violent? Tell it to the ghost of Dale Earnhardt!
This whole thing reeks of Jack Thompson-style bull****.