|
|
|
|
|
November 3rd, 2002, 02:38 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
It's virtually that way already. Most colonizable planets are in rings 2-3, with the occassional habitable world in ring 4. Gas Giants in the outer rings might harbour a M-class moon, but that doesn't occur very often.
[ November 03, 2002, 14:50: Message edited by: Captain Kwok ]
|
November 6th, 2002, 09:15 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Hi Kwok,
I was looking over the captains in the tech file, and was wondering if the Vulcan captain could decrease the Resource use of the ship (Vulcans are nothing if not efficient) plus maybe a minor reduction in Maintenance cost.
Just my 0.02$Cdn
Edit: Oh, and I don't think the movement bonuses that the captains give will be stackable with other movement bonuses (eg. mov bonus for impulse engines)
jimbob
[ November 06, 2002, 19:19: Message edited by: jimbob ]
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|
November 6th, 2002, 10:14 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Quote:
Originally posted by jimbob:
Hi Kwok,
I was looking over the captains in the tech file, and was wondering if the Vulcan captain could decrease the Resource use of the ship (Vulcans are nothing if not efficient) plus maybe a minor reduction in Maintenance cost.
Just my 0.02$Cdn
Edit: Oh, and I don't think the movement bonuses that the captains give will be stackable with other movement bonuses (eg. mov bonus for impulse engines)
jimbob
|
Reducing maintenance is the same thing as reducing the resource cost of a ship - however if you were talking about supplies - has anyone ever tried giving a component a negative value for supplies?
The movement bonus is not actually a movement bonus - it's just a single standard move - I suppose I should clarify that.
|
November 6th, 2002, 10:36 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Quote:
Reducing maintenance is the same thing as reducing the resource cost of a ship
|
There is a maintenance modification ability. It's used on bases to give 'em -50% to maintenance.
Just copy that, and have the vulcans give you -5% to maintenance.
__________________
Things you want:
|
November 7th, 2002, 12:12 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Kwok, et al
I was actually thinking of the trait for reduced supply usage:
Trait Type := Supply Cost
Value 1 := -25
Value 2 := 0
I just assumed it was under abilities, and could be used as such... but it's a trait type... hmm could we try to use it for a specific vessel, or would it reduce supply cost to all ships owned?! We could test it of course (that said, I suppose that I should do the testing, after all it was my big fat idea).
Of course if someone already knows it won't work, you could save me the trouble
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|
November 7th, 2002, 12:22 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Quote:
Modified Maintenance Cost
Value1 = Percentage of normal maintenance (10% = 110% of normal, -10% = 90% of normal)
Value2 = NOT USED
|
Just give that ability to the vulcan quartermaster component, and set value1 to -5.
End result: Ship that normally costs 1000 minerals, will normally pay 250 minerals maintenance, and now pays 237.5 (rounded down).
__________________
Things you want:
|
November 7th, 2002, 01:09 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Umm, SJ:
I think we are aware of how to reduce maintenance cost. What JimBob is referring to is the reducing the amount of supplies used by the ship through a component.
[ November 07, 2002, 05:46: Message edited by: Captain Kwok ]
|
November 8th, 2002, 05:19 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
Greetings and ugh - I'm so friggin' busy!
I had wanted to add more stuff to the website by this weekend - such as more detailed race information (biology, society, etc, etc), starship reports, html the tech list, and provide a checklist of stuff that needs to be done - but it looks like that will be on hold for a bit longer (read: couple weeks) before I get it a change to do it.
I have managed to sneak in a few half-hrs to work on the mod though - so progress continues!
Also, Geoschmo inspired an idea with his reference to armor skipping mines - the TNG mod now introduces Subspace Mines - very nasty buggers with subspace warheads and armor skipping damage!
|
November 13th, 2002, 04:34 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
ooooh! subspace mines. very DS9...espically with the warp points. if only we could make them self replicating...
__________________
The best diplomat that I know is a fully-loaded phaser bank. -- Lt. Cdr. Montgomery Scott
|
November 13th, 2002, 06:24 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: *** Star Trek Mod Discussion ***
I wish I could self-replicate some time.
Aside from that nitpick - it will be at least another week or so before I have anything significant to report in re: to the TNG mod.
I can't wait until mid-December - I think I'll finally be able to relax for a bit and put some serious time into the mod. I'm kind of embarrassed right now of how much I seem like Mr.Kodos - but at least I have a web site!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|