|
|
|
|
| Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|
June 24th, 2023, 05:51 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Scenario #568 Churchills at Kursk
Change "Churchill's" to Churchills in scenario title
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 30th, 2023, 03:36 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Scenario #586 Krinkelt-Rocherath
US bazooka H2 has a speed of 0. It is the only unit set to zero so I think it was an error.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 30th, 2023, 07:23 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
It does show "changed" in scenhack. I cannot see any reason why it would be zero so I have restored it to it's proper speed
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 30th, 2023, 08:49 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 681
Thanks: 91
Thanked 250 Times in 132 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Was the name of the unit commander changed? I have mild recollections about there being some famous engagement where they ambushed Panthers with a bazooka in this town. Maybe this was done as a "scripted" thing? I have set infantry to speed 0 before to get special play conditions, although I tend to mention that kind of thing in the briefing.
|
July 30th, 2023, 11:32 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ts4EVER
Was the name of the unit commander changed? I have mild recollections about there being some famous engagement where they ambushed Panthers with a bazooka in this town. Maybe this was done as a "scripted" thing? I have set infantry to speed 0 before to get special play conditions, although I tend to mention that kind of thing in the briefing.
|
It does not appear to be changed. That Bazooka unit leader is Lloyd and there is a Lloyd in the USA name list and it's not the only bazooka in town. If historically the operator was wounded or restricted in movement then I could see making the unit fixed in place but I can see no notes or reason for it so I have changed it as in the big scheme of things it's not in any way a game changer and having movement gives options for re-deployment that being fixed in place do not |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 31st, 2023, 06:27 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
586 was one of the lost and found I resurrected, something must of slipped through the process.
__________________
ASL
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zovs66 For This Useful Post:
|
|
July 31st, 2023, 03:59 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Scenario #588 Jewish Partisans
Partisans is misspelled "Partizans" in the scenario text. It is correct for the unit names.
|
July 31st, 2023, 04:32 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
This is another one I resurrected. I think the "Partizans" was intended from the original text. But that is based off of memories of three years ago.
__________________
ASL
|
August 1st, 2023, 05:06 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
"Partizan, a term for a partisan used in several Slavic languages"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partizan
So it's not technically misspelled but I will change it to Partisan for consistency |
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
August 4th, 2023, 05:19 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Scenario #591 Assault on Gambsheim
German FG gruppes AC1 and AD1 use SDKFZ 11 icons and act as soft vehicles.
In addition, they start loaded in units AA0 and AB0 respectively.
Formations D,E,F,G,H and X all head for the left map edge rather than towards any V hexes. They would be best if they stayed put.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode