|
|
|
|
 |
|
December 1st, 2007, 06:42 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Is this EA? I will try Ulm.
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|
December 1st, 2007, 07:36 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Zeldor mentioned MA at some point, (and my nation is for it) but any age will do for me.
DonCorazon, I'll reserve Ulm for you, reply if you have different preference for MA.
|
December 1st, 2007, 07:47 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Since I am playing MA Ulm in another game I'd like to try something new - can you put me down for Eriu? Thanks!
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|
December 2nd, 2007, 03:12 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Well, TrajanX is OP so he should make a final decision, but I think MA would be the best choice.
|
December 2nd, 2007, 08:42 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
I'd like to play C'tis, preferably in early age as I gaven't looked at the other ages.
|
December 2nd, 2007, 12:07 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 116
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Ok, we need then decide on the age first. Any age is ok for me; TrajanX mentioned EA on his first post, any objections for that?
|
December 2nd, 2007, 12:10 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
If TrajanX doesn't reappear in the next day or so I would recommend someone organised like FrozenFalcon spin this off into a new thread.
|
December 2nd, 2007, 12:18 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
MA is most user friendly  And I think that it could be harder to take down garrisons and so on with EA light troops. |
December 2nd, 2007, 12:22 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
Not sure about most user friendly, but I guess MA is most like traditional medieval fantasy (nations like Ulm, Marignon and Man). EA has more magic really. I think LA would be less good for a newbie game, with crazy nations like LA Ermor.
|
December 2nd, 2007, 12:34 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: New Team game, new(ish) players prefered
If it's MA, put me down for Pangaea.
Although I'm not opposed to LA, as I've played 1 each of EA and MA in MP so far. I'd have thought LA Ermor wasn't exactly a good nation for team play, given it's love of strong dominion and terrible scales.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
