Integrity2- EA game: Running - Page 5

dojango · #1 June 14th, 2012, 12:32 AM

If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one. That happened twice. So our mega-armies stayed in the same province while our reinforcing armies were slaughtered horribly. Horribly!

Since this happened twice, I can only assume that it is working as intended; and since you can't really expect someone to wait politely in a province while you move in reinforcements from all directions, it is just something to keep in mind when moving troops around. If you hadn't run those 20-30 troops into "province B" my main army would have been there with my reinforcements, and the battle would have gone a lot differently. So I have lost dozens of valiant pixelmen to this situation as well.

Bat/man · #2 June 14th, 2012, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dojango

If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one.

I'm not talking about moving armies A,B, C, D.

I'm talking that in the last 3 turns 4 scouts have attacked one army. So I'm just asking an end to solo leader attacks.

dojango · #3 June 14th, 2012, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bat/man

Quote:

Originally Posted by dojango

If you're referring to our little scuffle, there hasn't been any "commander blocking". Movement orders are being resolved in a screwy manner. You moved your armies from province A -> B and C -> B while I moved my armies from B -> C and D -> C. End result? Army A and B fought in province B while C and D fought in province C. I won one of those battles and you won one.

I'm not talking about moving armies A,B, C, D.

I'm talking that in the last 3 turns 4 scouts have attacked one army. So I'm just asking an end to solo leader attacks.

When army movements don't go through, the army defaults to patrolling. You're catching scouts who have been hiding in that province, or who are stealthing in to spy on that province (or who are carrying resupply gems for the army that failed to move).

Soyweiser · #4 June 15th, 2012, 08:24 AM

So this is easy to check, Bat/man where the scouts carrying gems/items?

Bat/man · #5 June 15th, 2012, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soyweiser

So this is easy to check, Bat/man where the scouts carrying gems/items?

I never saw any gems or items but they might have been there. I do know that I didn't get any "sneaking enemy" messages on at least some of these turns.

And when an army is in B going to A, and the scout is going to B - that doesn't seem like a resupply.

Maybe it was. Like I said It seemed to me that cmdr attacks were happening- but I'm great with the game as its gone so far, its been a lot of fun, and dojo has been a gentleman on his nap. Going forward if it happens, I'll send a copy of the turn file to our game organizer.

Anaconda · #6 June 15th, 2012, 08:33 AM

Its not my thread but attacking with a scout ignites a different kind of a message/announcement than finding a scout by patrolling. That should tell something about intentions.

Soyweiser · #7 June 22nd, 2012, 10:35 AM

Damn, running out of time today. Could you give me 24 more hours to do my turn?

ghoul31 · #8 June 22nd, 2012, 01:20 PM

Soyweiser · #9 June 24th, 2012, 08:46 AM

Ghoul, you are my hero! thanks. (A bit late).

Soyweiser · #10 June 25th, 2012, 05:24 AM

Just wanted to say, the previous remark was made before I looked at the turn. And I had not seen the attack by ghoul yet. Good move.