|
|
|
|
|
May 14th, 2008, 12:00 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 651
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
They are indeed random... however, you fail to notice a few things... there are little anchor provinces that actually connect many provinces... thus, the persons in (85) and (100) can, should and will soon have access to the southern provinces... you are correct that person in the NE has a good space of empty land underneath them, but such is the luck of the draw. Unless there is overwhelming discord in terms of starting positions, I am loath to reset, as it takes time and there is little chance that everyone will be satisfied with new positions.
|
May 14th, 2008, 03:12 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
I didn't fail to notice. However, if you just do a simple race to strategic borders expansion, the disparity is huge.
Two player 27s
One player 24
One player 22
Two player 18
One player 15
One player 12
Two player 10
One player 9
One player 7
In other words, if each player moves to secure chokepoints that allows him to expand in the maximum number of territories (sure, lots of assumptions) - the disparity is ridiculous.
Try it out.. color one territory a turn for each race. One person from each of the NE and NW continents needs to be moved to the south.
|
May 14th, 2008, 04:49 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
I let Dominions place the starting positions. It's true that it doesn't always do a very good job.
This thing about the VPs is very strange. I just used the ordinary Cradle map. I will try to take a look later. Maybe someone could post a screenshot of the weirdness.
|
May 14th, 2008, 11:34 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 651
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
As llama says, the computer generally picks the starting positions, and there will always be some imbalance. chrispedersen is obviously very concerned about the more crowded northern positions, particularly given the possibility of a bless rush.
So, while I would like to continue, I am ok with starting over again... but i'm not sure how much that will accomplish without:
a) A lot of work on llamabeast's part in designating 12 "balanced" starting positions
and/or
b) Getting rid of VP's so that starting positions are not immediately obvious. We cold also make vp's randomly placed... but then once again run into the problem of the game ending very early.
Thoughts? My vote is to continue. Turns are still due as this debate goes on, btw.
|
May 14th, 2008, 12:29 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 270
Thanks: 31
Thanked 25 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
I vote to continue, the starting position is always going to be more or less imbalanced. The terrain isn't the same all over the map and there are large areas with swamp and wasteland that isn't very valuable.
Personally I don't like my starting position, on the other hand I was really lucky with my position last time so I guess it evens out.
|
May 14th, 2008, 01:18 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 651
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: EA Game Strolling, part 2 - Looking for 2 more
chris has informed me he will be leaving the game. I will look for a replacement.
|
May 14th, 2008, 03:45 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Ok.. well I\'m out
Good luck guys!
I don't mind a minor imbalance, it is normal part of playing the game. However in this case the course of the game will likely be dictated by the starting conditions rather than skill, luck or the clash of titans.
In this particular case, three players have ready access to half of the territories, with the remaining 9 sharing half.
I had really looked forward to playing this game, and am quite disappointed. I think it would be illustrative if the people that did not want to change the positions would say which their positions were.
|
May 14th, 2008, 06:07 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 651
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Ok.. well I\'m out
Gregstrom will now be playing Lanka.
|
May 14th, 2008, 07:44 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: On strange look...
I'm also getting it (attached, edited only to remove reference to my province number)...
|
May 15th, 2008, 05:11 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chambéry (France)
Posts: 511
Thanks: 47
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: On strange look...
Looks like TC is already going to stale... ^^
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|