Global War (upgraded to 3.20) - Page 7

quantum_mechani · #1 September 26th, 2008, 02:51 PM

So, opinions people? Anyone have objections to having a neutral observer look at the turns?

Kheldron · #2 September 26th, 2008, 02:56 PM

No problem but any observer is in for a heck of a search through all provinces, leaders, equipment and all...ouch!
Who do you hate so much?

archaeolept · #3 September 26th, 2008, 03:05 PM

in terms of power it goes like this: shinu, r'lyeh, pan, aby, ulm or pyth, eriu, arcos.

Shinu has done the best of the neutrals, Aby of Evil, Ulm of Good (as pyth's power is in large part due to Ulm).

They're experimental victory conditions in an experimental game. Don't obsess. Either play it out, or say it was fun and end it - and critique the format in order to better prepare any eventual successor.

If R'lyeh and Pan join up, they might have a chance against Shinuyama; esp. if they can get some outside support.

DonCorazon · #4 September 26th, 2008, 04:28 PM

I vote for Shin, or I'll keep playing and TNN will launch all remaining forces for our final ride against the BURNINATOR. Pet Shop Boys will be heard in the magma pits of Abyssia...

Kheldron · #5 September 26th, 2008, 04:51 PM

Ok then QM had the lead for most of the game anyway. If Indy doesnt want to continue and he would be needed just to have a chance...well, hands down

I must also bow to Baalz who single handedly hold off the hoards from heavens for so long. That's a lesson in resilience. I learnt a lot just by watching the fights

archaeolept · #6 September 26th, 2008, 05:44 PM

hey, i'm still enjoying it... i thought r'lyeh wanted to continue? if not,...

DonCorazon · #7 September 26th, 2008, 06:20 PM

didnt you offer a choice to play it out or end it? that's why i voted. I am fine either way. I just need more action - the BURNINATOR has been quiet in TNN for a long time and now that Ermor is gone, well, the Sidhe have nobody to play with.

quantum_mechani · #8 September 27th, 2008, 07:57 PM

Well if no one can agree on something I guess the default is just dropping the whole game. If that's where it's going though I'd prefer to get at least some closure by having somone look at it.

DonCorazon · #9 September 27th, 2008, 09:27 PM

I think a winner should be declared or we play on. I'd hate just to drop it with out even electing someone. There doesn't seem to be much interest in playing on but, again, I am down with whatever the majority is up for.

CUnknown · #10 September 28th, 2008, 09:57 PM

Maybe we can get Foodstamp to look at everyone and elect a winner? Or declare a tie, at least? I will ask him.