|
|
|
|
|
June 14th, 2004, 06:39 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Heidelberg
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Thank you very much!
|
June 14th, 2004, 07:35 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
I'm a programmer and I rather like Python, though I've only seriously used it for one project several years ago. It's extremely flexible about what it lets you do, and it offers strong cross-platform libraries to do all kinds of things.
It's extremely good for fast prototyping, or anything where execution speed isn't critical, but development speed is desired. The cross-platform aspect is great, too.
It was quite easy to learn and use. Also since it costs nothing, it doesn't hurt to give it a try.
PvK
|
June 14th, 2004, 08:24 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
RATS. EotFS was so recently without a publisher? Why didnt we get them signed on here?
Quote:
NEWS (updated 6-8-04)
Holistic Design Inc. Signs on to (snipped)
|
Any others hanging out there waiting for a publisher?
[ June 14, 2004, 19:25: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ]
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
June 14th, 2004, 08:57 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Hm, I was under the impression that "Stars! Supernova" had publisher problems as well. I haven't checked their site for a long, long time however. For all I know, Mare Crisium dissolved already.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
June 14th, 2004, 10:21 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Yeah but they want a publisher who will do "advances". Pay them to work on finishing it.
I do think that Stars was a wonderful game. And I would LOVE to see the new one come out, but Im not sure Id want to put MY neck out that far to see it.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
June 15th, 2004, 03:18 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 181
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
I'm a programmer and I rather like Python, though I've only seriously used it for one project several years ago. It's extremely flexible about what it lets you do, and it offers strong cross-platform libraries to do all kinds of things.
It's extremely good for fast prototyping, or anything where execution speed isn't critical, but development speed is desired. The cross-platform aspect is great, too.
It was quite easy to learn and use. Also since it costs nothing, it doesn't hurt to give it a try.
PvK
|
The strong cross-platform libraries is what has interested me since I plan on using this ability quite liberally. I do have somewhat of a concern on execution speed. What have you experienced with execution speed. Comparable to Pascal or Perl? Do you have any references that you reccomend? My skill level I would say is moderate. I know mostly industrial automation Languages such as Ladder Logic, LISP, Pascal and Fortran. I play with C++ but I am stil self teaching myself.
__________________
Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
- Henry Louis Mencken
|
June 15th, 2004, 08:18 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 410
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
As for execution speed, there are plenty of tests out there. I random one from google is here.
As for cross-platform and as long as you plan to distribute the executables, there are lot of choices, from C/C++ (with XP libraries) to Perl, Python and Ruby. A short breakdown:
C/C++: Nothing beats these beast for availbility of libraries; relatively hard to learn; unparalleled execution speed.
Perl/Python: The two by far most popular scripting Languages. Both offer excellent XP, large libraries, slow execution speed and fast development time. Python is "stricter" and more formal than Perl; otherwise the Languages are very similar in aim&spirit, so pick the one you like the most.
Ruby: Is relatively new. If you don't care about popularity and large libraries, this may be the ticket. It looks really, really cool but I have not yet had the pleasure.
__________________
"It makes you wonder if there is anything to astrology after all. "Oh, there is," said Susan, "Delusion, wishful thinking and gullibility." (T. Pratchett)
|
June 15th, 2004, 09:38 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 596
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Instead of learning C or C++, I recommend stabbing yourself in the head. It will be less painful and you will probably end up with a better program. Except if you are writing specialized software like hardware device drivers or a graphics rendering engine, or if you have to maintain a program that is already written in one of these Languages, there is not any good reason to use them. They are totally obsolete.
If you do have to maintain a program already written in C or C++, see my previous advice.
|
June 15th, 2004, 10:37 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Quote:
Originally posted by PrinzMegaherz:
Halfling Slingers of doom.
They owned nearly every standard unit in the game due to their luck. I love them :-)
quote: s it possible to get a Version of Master of Magic that works for windows xp? I'll check out that site Gandalf mentions.
|
If that is what you whish, here you go: Dosbox
Emulates a complete computer that is capable of running most of the older games... I'm using it for Mom, Dungeon MAster and Star Control, also the Last one got some graphical errors Apologies for this very late offtopic reply.
Why run DM and SC (the second one I assume) in DosBox?
In case you didn't know:
Dungeon Master - Return to Chaos
PC remake of DM and CSB with minor enhancements. Currently at Version 0.28 but it's quite stable (only had a couple crashes playing through DM). Also coming up is a map editor so there may be new dungeons to explore in the future.
The Ur-Quan Masters
Remake of Star Control 2. Version 0.3 so far and it's somewhat buggy.
[ June 15, 2004, 15:34: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ]
|
June 15th, 2004, 02:21 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,013
Thanks: 17
Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Flowers for the grave of MoM.
Quote:
Originally posted by Sheap:
They are totally obsolete.
|
Which is, of course, a totally false statement, but don't mind. Keep on spreading that FUD.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|