|
|
|
|
|
April 6th, 2009, 05:34 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Other games have gone funny too? More than just delayed hosting? Oh dear, I hope not.
I'm actually at a conference at the moment, and it's past my (feeble) bedtime, so I won't look at this now. I'll investigate in the morning. It should be possible to get it worked out, although a stale may wind up being inevitable - we'll see.
|
April 6th, 2009, 05:54 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Knife Bright Insight has cursed you from beyond the grave!
P.S. You are all DOOMED!
P.P.S. DPWMED!
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
April 6th, 2009, 06:24 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PsiSoldier
Quote:
Originally Posted by atul
It's more common than just Preponderance. Many games appear to be affected by /something/.
|
Yeah I think they know that but...
It looks like Preponderance is the one that caused it though...
For what that's worth.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamabeast
Other games have gone funny too? More than just delayed hosting? Oh dear, I hope not.
I'm actually at a conference at the moment, and it's past my (feeble) bedtime, so I won't look at this now. I'll investigate in the morning. It should be possible to get it worked out, although a stale may wind up being inevitable - we'll see.
|
Or...
Maybe they didnt know that...
I guess Llamabeast hadnt visited the thread about lammaserver before he'd read that.. Although I see he has now.
And here I had skipped school today to look at my Preponderance turn and all. Not really but I did skip school and I was hoping to look at Preponderance at least...
|
April 6th, 2009, 10:09 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
so i have two copies of .trn 57
4error messages
2admin messages
and one proper set of .trn 56?
does that mean that this latest email is good to go and we're back on track and none of that nonsense matters anymore?
actually nevermind the newest files which say 56 in the email are really turn 57 dang so we have three copies of turn 57!!! ahhhhhh.... looks like really no one ever got turn 56 so we needa rehost turn 55 somehow? but now theres a llamaserver under maitencen message? dang
|
April 7th, 2009, 02:49 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 540
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
at what point are we giving up on getting the .trn files for turn 56 and just continuing? will there be an announcement made on the matter sometime?
|
April 7th, 2009, 11:15 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
I think we're waiting for llamabeast to get home and check into what happened.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
April 7th, 2009, 03:48 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Nooo! It's gone mad! Why?
Ignore all the e-mails for a bit please, apologies for any error or turn 57 spam.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to llamabeast For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 03:59 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
Okay, fixy fixy! You should have got a message from me. Play again from turn 55, and hopefully it will run smoothly. If not, you may have to accept the stale turn.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to llamabeast For This Useful Post:
|
|
April 7th, 2009, 04:00 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
So we are at turn 55. Are there all .2h files for that turn? Can I force host?
|
April 7th, 2009, 04:33 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [1-2 subs needed!]
No, that's the point, you need new 2h files or it'll crash again. I've actually removed the old 2h files.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|