|
|
|
|
|
September 9th, 2007, 06:28 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 883
Thanks: 14
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
I'm for the turn limit.
Reason? The number 4. Instead of a big game stopping with a whimper (everyone just quits), it goes off with a bang (everyone's bidding their hand for top position). At least in ideal universe.
I just played a game of Risk 2210 AD with my friends. The largest change to normal Risk was a turn limit. After 5 turns, the game ends and winner is declared. Sounds like madness, but it actually worked really well.
BTW, turn limit of 120 turns or so is a lot. Perp is in turn 66 and has only third or so of the original cast left.
|
September 9th, 2007, 08:06 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
atul said:
Perp is in turn 66 and has only third or so of the original cast left.
|
And arguably is not terribly far from coming to a head in terms of critical mass of a couple of nations. I'll be kinda surprised if it goes another 20 turns without it being overwhelmingly obvious who the winner is going to be.
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
September 9th, 2007, 10:06 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Why has the game to end at a fixed turn?
If you want to make it shorter, then there are enough other possibilities for victory, like the first to reach 250 provinces and hold them for 3 turns wins. So there is a game where noone will have to manage 400 province empires and it will not end apruptly. (as the empire that has 250 provinces needs to be strong enough to hold his provinces for 3 turns [i think using the normal province victory of dom3 would make the game too suspectible to air drop blunders])
I personally think that a turn limit is a pretty boring end to a megagame. Also, how would it be for the nation that has just 1 province less than the victor and now just lost the game (maybe this secon nation gained already defeated the 'winning' nation at war, but just needs some more time).
If you want to end the game, just wish for armageddon ten times, and most players will leave out of frustration.
|
September 9th, 2007, 10:55 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Baalz said:
Quote:
atul said:
Perp is in turn 66 and has only third or so of the original cast left.
|
And arguably is not terribly far from coming to a head in terms of critical mass of a couple of nations. I'll be kinda surprised if it goes another 20 turns without it being overwhelmingly obvious who the winner is going to be.
|
In radiance the game went to turn 105+ or so with 5 or so viable contenders. That wasn't even a mega game.
Jazzepi
|
September 9th, 2007, 11:28 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Jazzepi said:
Quote:
Baalz said:
Quote:
atul said:
Perp is in turn 66 and has only third or so of the original cast left.
|
And arguably is not terribly far from coming to a head in terms of critical mass of a couple of nations. I'll be kinda surprised if it goes another 20 turns without it being overwhelmingly obvious who the winner is going to be.
|
In radiance the game went to turn 105+ or so with 5 or so viable contenders. That wasn't even a mega game.
Jazzepi
|
Yea - and the game ended without a real winner because people were simply too tired to keep playing. Radiance is an excellent example of why I support some sort of end.
|
September 9th, 2007, 11:29 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,712
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Quote:
Hadrian_II said:
Why has the game to end at a fixed turn?
If you want to make it shorter, then there are enough other possibilities for victory, like the first to reach 250 provinces and hold them for 3 turns wins. So there is a game where noone will have to manage 400 province empires and it will not end apruptly. (as the empire that has 250 provinces needs to be strong enough to hold his provinces for 3 turns [i think using the normal province victory of dom3 would make the game too suspectible to air drop blunders])
|
I could agree to something like that. 250-400 seems somewhat reasonable.
|
September 9th, 2007, 11:30 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
So, basically what you're saying is that propping up a victor, through an artificial metric, who didn't really win is better than no winner at all. I completely disagree.
Jazzepi
|
September 9th, 2007, 02:31 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
Velusion, there was quite a bit of discussion on why turn limits are bad. So i very much disagree with your statement that noone seriously addressed the issue.
The biggets reason is that it causes all strategies to warp and culminate at that end of the world turn limit.
I, along with others who have said so, will not play in any turn limit game also. But at least you tell us in advance, so we can choose whether to play or not. Unlike the last game I played with another host.
And, having said that, you host, you get to choose the rules. So we all can choose.
|
September 9th, 2007, 02:42 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
well, hmm, ok, just read your last post,
I have to agree your upper turn limits sound way more than reasonable. 250-400. I think we can all agree on something there so Velusion does not have nightmares about hosting some game forever.
|
September 9th, 2007, 02:43 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Placeholder for new Megagame - Evermore
That was a number or provinces, not a turn limit.
Jazzepi
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|