|
|
|
 |
|

June 1st, 2002, 06:51 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
The idea is good and was mentioned before. still, people say it would cripple the AI
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

June 1st, 2002, 07:04 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Well no, i know what'll be "their" objection and i'd have to agree with it. With the extra 7 research levels it would be rather useless to research PPB - at the same cost minus 100k of physics lvl2. By the time you reach PPB 8-12 to make it actually useful the enemy will be in advantage in research and probably even will have phased shields to counter your high tech PPB. The deal is that PPB is NOT late game weapon.
I think i see the solution:
Increase the levels to 7-8 and increase the starting research cost to 10k (same as MB). that'll even the things without crippling the weapon.
Still the AI will be in advantage, but hey its AI
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

June 1st, 2002, 11:06 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Yes an increase to 7-8 levels might be more balanced for the standard set.
In Proportions people are stuck with unphased shields for longer, and there are higher levels of unphased shields, and fighters remain viable weapons but lack phased shields, and cost tradeoffs are more important, so PPB remains valuable even when weakened in Proportions.
This sort of change is only a disadvantage to AI's designed to take advantage of the original PPB. Others won't use PPB's anyway, so they'll be better off.
PvK
|

June 2nd, 2002, 12:39 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Taera:
The idea is good and was mentioned before. still, people say it would cripple the AI
|
hehehehe, and, what about the Ionic Disperser fix?
Still I'm working with my races to adapt them...
|

June 2nd, 2002, 05:30 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
The next patch will probably address this. The current beta has no more shield-skipping effect for engine-damaging weapons.
PvK
|

June 2nd, 2002, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
The next patch will probably address this. The current beta has no more shield-skipping effect for engine-damaging weapons.
PvK
|
My previous post was related with this "fix"...
Now I'm removing the ID for most of the Aquilaeian ships... trying to keep them still competitive after the new patch.
|

June 3rd, 2002, 09:18 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
Why the ID still could be useful.
Add it as secondary weapon to a small size warship, say cruiser or so. this way it'll always have only 1 of the type. If the shields of the targets are down, it'll be nice. if they're not, the ID would help to get the job done.
From now on the weapon can be considered an improvement over DUC.
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

June 3rd, 2002, 09:23 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
So.... do we have a decision relating to the PPB?
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

June 3rd, 2002, 09:31 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
I think we decided we can't agree. 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

June 3rd, 2002, 09:41 PM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 1,896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: PPB Rebalance Poll
LOL, great Avatar!
Big Geo is watching you  .
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|