|
|
|
|
November 2nd, 2006, 06:24 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Nations that seem strong/weak
I'll start.
Early Age - Strong
Sauromatia: This mounted terror shoots to the top of charts in every game it has been in. Great gem income, a diversity of aproaches to playing them, even better Misfortune tolerance than usual, blood magic, poisonous archers, blessable lizards...the list goes on.
Van/Helheim: Great blessables. Glamour troops. Vanheim gets Blade wind with the Dwarves and Blade Wind rules the Early Age.
Mictlan: Their troops are nowhere near as sucky as they used to be in the early age and the new blood summons are superb, especially Ozelotls who have terrifying synergy with the usual F9 W9 bless.
Neifelheim: Niefel Bussiness as usual, now with 256% More Wolves. 100% Ewil.
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 2nd, 2006, 09:01 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 1,221
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
Vanheim & Helheim are very strong nations for blitz games, we usually ban them. Also we allow only 1 level9 blessing in the blitz games nowadays. Games are much more balanced like this.
__________________
Dominions 3. Wallpapers & Logos
-------
"Training is principally an act of faith. The athlete must believe in its efficacy: he must believe that through training he will become fitter and stronger, that by constant repetition of the same movements he will become more skillful."
|
November 2nd, 2006, 02:12 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
Multiplayer blitz games (usually played on maps where the provinces equal playerx10 or less) with no special victory conditions definetly do a lot toward defining strong/weak nations. I think that more game settings might help with those.
Mictlan with that flying stealth titan assassin pretender can also make a major dent in a blitz game very early on.
Neifelheim loses many of its drawbacks in a game like that, and it offers one of the few other strategies for a small blitz game (defensive buildup)
On the other hand, Im cranking up for some mega games on maximum maps which might shake out some people whose rankings of nations are too cast in cement. There are alot of game variations to explore.
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
November 2nd, 2006, 02:55 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
The nice part about dominions is experienced players have proven that no nation is so crippled to be completely hopeless in a MP game. Even some weak nations like Abysia have one or two saving graces (Demonbred in their case with axe infantries not so bad buys if I recall). Tien Chi MA gets xbows and consorts. EA Ryleh gets nice flavor and aquatic thugs.
Also superior raiding strategies and decent pretenders/diplomatics go a long way.
|
November 2nd, 2006, 03:08 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hyvinkää, Finland
Posts: 2,703
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
Since when Abysia is considered weak? O_o
__________________
"Boobs are OK. Just not for Nerfix [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Smile.gif[/img] ."
- Kristoffer O.
|
November 2nd, 2006, 03:13 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,050
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
My guess would be since old age became a problem. In Dom2 anyway Abysia wasn't thought of as weak last I remember.
__________________
Great indebtedness does not make men grateful, but vengeful; and if a little charity is not forgotten, it turns into a gnawing worm.
|
November 2nd, 2006, 03:17 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Nations that seem strong/weak
Quote:
Nerfix said:
Since when Abysia is considered weak? O_o
|
The aging feature hits Abysia harder than most nations.
At least one unit is bugged where precision was incorrectly switched with encumbrance. {ouch}
Most if not all troops have movement of one, which is noticeable for the larger maps.
I haven't played all the nations to actually call them weak, but those are the disadvantages I noticed.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|