|
|
|
|
|
August 26th, 2002, 04:06 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Star Trek Ship Plans
On some web sites devoted to ST, I see reference to a book of schematics of ships. I have the only two ST books - including the 'tech' manual - that purport to offer that info and there are not that many schematics or ship plan views in them.
Is there a definitive book or web site (one that's not down) that has that info or ... ?
TIA.
__________________
'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|
August 26th, 2002, 06:23 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
Well, to make ships really "canon", one must use the edited screen shots of ST ships. Any attempt to make a model based on some book can legitimately provoke the cries of "not canon!"
In this sense, the most "canon" federation shipset is one on Kyat shipyards. All Atrocities' shipsets have a touch of his personality.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|
August 26th, 2002, 08:05 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
What I need - though - are plans (top, side, front, rear, bottom) views so that I can construct some meshes.
[ August 26, 2002, 19:36: Message edited by: Elowan ]
__________________
'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|
August 26th, 2002, 09:36 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
Ok.... What the h*** is this canon thing or is it cannon..
I have seen both variations....
Are canon and cannon two seperate things and what are they and why are they such a touchy subject.
....
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
August 26th, 2002, 09:39 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
i dunno, but someone should take a cannon to these canonists.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|
August 26th, 2002, 10:14 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
All I'm looking for is schematics. Who said anything about canon? Sheesh!
__________________
'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|
August 26th, 2002, 10:25 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Somewhere on the wine-dark sea...
Posts: 236
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
Quote:
Originally posted by Elowan:
All I'm looking for is schematics. Who said anything about canon? Sheesh!
|
For TOS, a company called Franz Josef Designs produced several licensed products which had some of this info. They are long out of print, though, as they were produced in the 1960's while TOS was still a prime time series on NBC. These were heavily used by the designers of Star Fleet Battles.
The "Star Fleet Technical Manual" had views of several Federation ships - top, side & front, IIRC. This included the Constitution-class Heavy Cruiser of course, plus the Scout, Destroyer & Tug (with various cargo modules). There was a page for the Dreadnought as well, but IIRC it was presented with fewer drawings as something for the "future" - not yet deployed by Star Fleet. No non-Federation ships were included.
FJD also produced a set of plans for the Constition class. This showed details of every deck.
The original SFB Designers Notes made references to such deck plans for the Klingon Battlecruiser and Romulan Warbird (as sen on TOS), which the SFB designer says were used in determining what those ships carried. I never saw these myself (I owned the first two).
I don't know of any web site with this stuff posted - probably would be of questionable legality anyway. You might try through some service that finds out of print books.
|
August 26th, 2002, 10:31 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
I seem to remember those plans. They were very, very detailed but did not include a "head".
|
August 26th, 2002, 11:16 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Private
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
I will get the url for you.
[ August 26, 2002, 22:17: Message edited by: ManOfWar ]
__________________
What distinguishes war is , not that man is slain, but that he is slain, spoiled, crushed by the cruelty, the injustice, the treachery, the murderous hand of man. William Ellery Channing
|
August 26th, 2002, 11:36 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Star Trek Ship Plans
"Are canon and cannon two seperate things and what are they and why are they such a touchy subject."
canon is applying to "official" material; basiclly anything that has been confirmed as existing in that universe. (also sometimes applies to stuff that doesn't blatently break the rules of that universe)
canNon. Well. That's a weapon
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|