|
|
|
|
|
December 9th, 2006, 04:17 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
In my past two games, I've taken provinces with access to Shamblers. The shamblers have good hit points and have very littl drain on resources (normally 1 resource per shambler). If you have cash, you can raise huge armies of shamblers each turn. I've been able to overwhelm the opposition once I get Shambler provinces. Are Shambler provinces unbalancced?
Varangian
|
December 9th, 2006, 04:27 PM
|
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
no, the large gold cost and low prot+lack of shield evens it out imo.
|
December 9th, 2006, 04:46 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
I wouldn't think so. They are not too difficult to counter.
Edi
|
December 9th, 2006, 04:53 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bavaria , Germany
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
Quote:
Shovah32 said:
no, the large gold cost and low prot+lack of shield evens it out imo.
|
Yeah this is exactly my experience too.
They are imho only attractive for conquering the seas.
But for the 30 gold you would get 3 shortbowmen e.g..
And those 3 shortbowmen only cost 3x4 resources. Or 4 Slingers, they cost 4x2 resources.
For me usually gold is the bottleneck though. So the 1 resourcecost of the Shambler is not a too big advantage.
|
December 9th, 2006, 07:38 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 739
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
You need them to invade the seas. They're pretty wimpy, though.
|
December 9th, 2006, 08:33 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
Quote:
Varangian said:
Are Shambler provinces unbalancced?
Varangian
|
No, my guess is your opposition are average computer opponents or humans less experienced with the game. Shrambler units are good for moving into the water provinces.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
December 10th, 2006, 03:27 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
I don't like shamblers. They are weak.
I only use them if I have no other way to go into the sea. And then recruit the more survivable indies I find in the sea.
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
December 10th, 2006, 01:22 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
I also think that shamblers are weak, ichtyids are IMHO a more viable choice for getting a foothold underwater. You might need some luck with resorce-rich prowince or a castle built though.
Basic shamblers have terrible survivability, not unlike cavemen, who also seems tough at first glance but, lacking protection, die in droves.
|
December 10th, 2006, 04:02 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: East Norriton, PA
Posts: 744
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
but, late game, when you have high gold, the low reasource and high HP melds good with earth spells like army of gold, or even weaker prot-boosting items.
They seem to me to be a decently cheap chassis for troop buffing spells, no?
|
December 10th, 2006, 04:33 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Are land provinces with Shamblers unbalancing?
Shamblers wear no armor, which IIRC makes them "immune" to spells that increase protection from armor. (immune in the bad way, of course)
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|