|
|
|
|
|
November 6th, 2007, 02:34 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
I've pretty much played-out my ULM mood in my recent game. I'm looking at the various nations now and looking for someone who is more like ULM's opposite. I don't care which age, but someone who feels completely different from ULM. In my head, that means vastly more reliant on magic than the army, and not so focussed on magic items (someone who does construction as the low-priority research).
Just curious, who do you guy's think is ULM's opposite?
-Jeff
P.S. Note I am completely avoiding the balance issue here. I'm talking about flavor.
|
November 6th, 2007, 03:09 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Urban Wilderness
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
I'd say EA R'lyeh. The logistics and play style of the two races are about as far apart as it is possible to get, IMO.
|
November 6th, 2007, 03:12 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,266
Thanks: 18
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
So, if Ulm's opposite=crap troops + great magic, how about LA Ermor?
In the Middle Era...Shinuyama? They have weak troops (along with some better but expensive ones that are difficult to recruit in mass) and nice magery potential.
__________________
In strait places gar keep all store,
And burn the plain land them before:
Then shall they pass away in haste,
When that they find nothing but waste...
|
November 6th, 2007, 03:15 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
Oh, but not the water races. Me no likey the water. :-)
-Jeff
|
November 6th, 2007, 03:42 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 39
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
I'd say the different Caelums? Apart from having strong magic, they also have great mobility, which is something else that's totally different from the way Ulm plays.
__________________
Praeterea censeo, contributoribus magnae auctoritatis e Foro Shrapnelsi frequenter in exsilium eiectis, eos qui verum auxilium petunt melius hoc situ adiuvari posse.
|
November 6th, 2007, 05:06 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,617
Thanks: 179
Thanked 304 Times in 123 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
I can second Shinyama. It's a nation that really makes you think. I'll give you a hint, thought.
Darkness: research it, love it, use it.
__________________
I have now officially moved to the Dom3mods forums and do not actively use this account any more. You can stll contact me by PM's, since my account gives e-mail notifications on such occasions.
If you need to ask something about modding, you can contact me here.
See this thread for the latest info concerning my mods.
|
November 10th, 2007, 06:26 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Need ULM\'s opposite. :-)
Ulm: slow units, heavy infantry and cavalry, arbalests as only missile troops, only one mage, construction/evocation based research with some buff/debuff possibilities
Pangaea has Centaurs (good cavalry), Satyr infantry (light, fast, stealthy), satyr hoplites (decent, slower); you can choose between Panii and the Dryads, and Nature gives some interesting choices. If you take a Death pretender, or Late Age Pan, you'd also get the national undead summons and mandragora reanimation.
Caelum, as mentioned. Mammoths, flying archers, the well-armored fliers are hard to use well, very good, mobile mages.
Perhaps MA Tien Chi, if you play with the newest patch. They got a bunch of mapmove 2 infantry, they already had good archers, and they have LOTS of different mages. Acid evocations and lots of other fun stuff.
|
November 10th, 2007, 07:34 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 2,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Mictlan.
Mictlan. Moreso EA or LA.
Normally played with a high bless (not sure how well a scalemonster build would work -- not Mictlan's forte, I suspect), and with mandatory blood magic providing nasty summons. Items are still nice, but power will come from the summons.
Bless strats are a bit rare for Ulm, but with Mictlan, it might actually be reasonable to go berserk with F9W9 Jaguar Warriors, trying to grow your empire while not over-expanding your horribly unpleasant dominion.
__________________
Are we insane yet? Are we insane yet? Aiiieeeeee...
|
November 12th, 2007, 05:58 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 724
Thanks: 93
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan.
I will also nominate Shinyama. Great magic paths, but I do not like the troops at all.
__________________
Men do not quit playing because they grow old; they grow old because they quit playing.
Oliver Wendell Holmes
|
November 13th, 2007, 08:27 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Mictlan.
Yeah, I tried several times to play Shinu, twas a disaster, the AI did not let me enougth research time, and crushed my non-shielded army.
Must try again, with darkness spell.
True it plays VERY different than Ulm.
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|