.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old February 1st, 2001, 08:55 AM

Armageddon Armageddon is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Armageddon is on a distinguished road
Default Game Diplomacy vs Real Diplomacy

I'm sure you are all sick of me crying about the poor diplomatic model, but I had a thought today that I wanted to share.

After some thought, I realized one of the most serious problems with most computer diplomacy. Wars go on forever. In reality, most wars Last for very short times. Even Ancient Era wars had distinct ends before hostiles sparked up again. A war is fought, someone loses and territory or other assets are exhanged.

In most computer games (Civ, SE4, etc) wars tend to go on until one side or the other ceases to exist. This is fine sometimes, but it gets rather old. I would prefer to see more limited wars, with one empire capturing a city or planet or system and then forcing the enemy to surrender the current conflict, and make concessions. As it is, wars start and then tend to go on forever, thus eliminating any chance for diplomacy and trade to resume.

In SE4, if an enemy (or you) realizes you are going to lose, you should be able to simply sue for peace. Then, the 'victor' could propose a treaty and terms. If you sign it, the war would end and trade could resume, with a normalization of relations. If you refused, the war would continue, and if you were in really bad shape, you would be destroyed.

It is rare that games impose any sort of penalty for these wars that never end. Call to Power has the various alert levels, which are a great idea and should be emulated by other developers. It allows you to maintain a large army at reduced cost and effectiveness. SE4 allows mothballing, which helps, but it still often leans towards eternal wars due to the stupidity of the AI.

Basically, I want to see more detailed diplomacy. Having complicated treaties would be a great deal of fun and would be more realistic. The 'death or glory' attitude of the AI is just silly. If a species is facing utter extinction or conquest, it would sue for peace unless, like a few races, it belives in death before defeat. Most races, which are less warlike, would be likely to attempt to bargain.

Mod Makers- If anyone can add in better diplomacy, I would be eternally grateful. Simply manipulation of the data files seems to do nothing for me. I have altered the MEE status and even tried to 'cheat' by giving huge anger reductions for even simple actions like general Messages, but to no avail. The AI still behaves like a complete loon in diplomatic talks.



------------------
--Armageddon
"Ernest Hemmingway once wrote, 'The world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.' I agree with the later."

Morgan Freeman
Seven
__________________
--Armageddon
Ernest Hemmingway once wrote, 'The world is a fine place, and worth fighting for.' I agree with the later.
Morgan Freeman
Seven
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.