|
|
|
|
|
April 5th, 2008, 03:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 144
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Cavemen
Strength 17 and cost of 40gp. But useless in battle. However I seem to remember the siege formula being a bonus for strength over 10. So would cavemen a good siege army to follow your main army around or to reinforce key castles?
|
April 5th, 2008, 03:26 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
If you like paying way over the odds for okish siegers, sure.
|
April 5th, 2008, 03:44 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,691
Thanks: 5
Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
but wasn't there something with strengthx strength for siege what would that make them compared to 10 gold strength 10 troops?
__________________
Want a blend of fantasy and sci-fi? Try the total conversion Dominions 3000 mod with a new and fully modded solar system map.
Dragons wanted? Try the Dragons, Magic Incarnate nation.
New and different undead nation? Try Souls of Shiar. Including new powerfull holy magic.
In for a whole new sort of game? Then try my scenario map Gang Wars.
|
April 5th, 2008, 04:12 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
Yes, they are better than one 10 gold, 10 strength trooper. No, they are not
better than four of them. They eat less, though. I like using the commanders
as early thugs. Otherwise, I do not recruit them.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|
April 5th, 2008, 04:35 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
Cavemen - 17 str = 2.9 siege strength or 13.8 gold per siegepoint.
Basic human infantry - 10 str = 1 siege strength or 10 gold per siegepoint.
Like Tuidjy says, unless you have supply problems, never worth it, and even then, not really.
|
April 5th, 2008, 05:33 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
They have partial cold and fire immunity. Combine them in the late game with the spells that grant your troops partial immunity and armoring spells, and you've got a crack squad of late-game troopers that can survive massive Evoking.
|
April 5th, 2008, 06:33 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
Don't they have 8 MR ? And no armour to buff ?
Might reduce their survivability in the late game a touch.
|
April 5th, 2008, 07:08 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
Quote:
Digress said:
Don't they have 8 MR ? And no armour to buff ?
Might reduce their survivability in the late game a touch.
|
Spells like Wooden Warriors or Army of Lead give units a set armor number, so I don't think I understand your question.
And the MR 8 is a weakness, but nothing is perfect. The fact that you can use Mass Regeneration and use them with a heavy evoking strategy more than makes up for it. I mean, if you send a few thugs to attack rear you can draw MR-targetting spells off the weaker units. Its basic strategy.
|
April 5th, 2008, 09:14 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 437
Thanks: 18
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
I just think describing them as a "crack squad" might be a bit generous.
I am not suggesting that their hitpoints and resistances aren't useful - but in the mid to late game I really like higher MR.
|
April 5th, 2008, 10:00 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Cavemen
Given the cost I still don't think they're worth it. In the late game the gold would be better spent on mages.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|