.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 26 to 50 of 500
Search took 0.02 seconds; generated 105 minute(s) ago.
Search: Posts Made By: thatguy96
Forum: TO&Es April 29th, 2010, 07:34 PM
Replies: 9
Views: 3,564
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Colombia

There are no plans by the developers to add or change any of the existing nations. The only way to have Colombia in game would be to make a custom OOB from scratch that would replace an existing...
Forum: TO&Es April 26th, 2010, 11:20 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 6,450
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Bradleys

The FKSM is a bit confusing. I re-read it after you pointed that out and it appears that for some reason the (x3) note is mentioned twice for the M3 CFVs in the Battalion Scout Platoon. The Scout...
Forum: TO&Es April 26th, 2010, 08:28 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 6,450
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Bradleys

Unfortunately, the US Army method of designating units is confusing and obtuse. There is a lot on that website that is incorrect (emphasis added where useful):


With the elimination of the...
Forum: TO&Es April 26th, 2010, 07:53 PM
Replies: 12
Views: 6,450
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Bradleys

in this case I would highly prefer first hand info not something else dug off the 'net

Don[/QUOTE]
According to FKSM 71-8, Armor/Cavalry Reference Data, Brigade Combat Teams, dated November 2005,...
Forum: TO&Es April 18th, 2010, 02:51 PM
Replies: 2,005
Sticky: MBT's
Views: 827,060
Posted By thatguy96
Re: MBT's

Never said they weren't or even that it wasn't prudent on the part of the Russians (and everyone else still churning out T-72 derivatives).

It was a comment on the need for Western defense...
Forum: TO&Es April 17th, 2010, 01:19 AM
Replies: 132
Views: 57,842
Posted By thatguy96
Re: MRAPs and a couple of general questions.

Not all HMMWVs, all Up-Armored HMMWVs. This is an important distinction. This was the USMC plan with the original MRAPs and it didn't last long. It will be interesting to see if this actually...
Forum: TO&Es April 6th, 2010, 09:29 AM
Replies: 2,005
Sticky: MBT's
Views: 827,060
Posted By thatguy96
Re: MBT's

The 152mm gun on the M551 (along with the different gun used on the M60A2) used a set of squat, combustible case rounds. The HEAT round was only intended to engage tanks at ranges shorter than the...
Forum: TO&Es March 9th, 2010, 12:10 AM
Replies: 3
Views: 2,615
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Vietnam Era TO&Es

The current ones up on the net still have a lot of errors in them. I've been working with them a lot lately, and I'm really surprised how many things slipped by, especially in those that I did...
Forum: TO&Es March 8th, 2010, 09:58 PM
Replies: 3
Views: 2,615
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Vietnam Era TO&Es

These are out of date. The most up to date ones online can be found here (http://fieldsoffireonline.freeforums.org/toe-quick-guide-t307-15.html) or through a sub-group...
Forum: TO&Es February 18th, 2010, 09:25 PM
Replies: 8
Views: 4,076
Posted By thatguy96
Re: WW2 Tank Destroyers in Korean War?

The M18 and M36 Tank Destroyers were supplied to the South Koreans. The United States Army had phased all its tank destroyers out with the disbanding of the entire Tank Destroyer Corps in 1945. The...
Forum: WinSPWW2 February 11th, 2010, 02:51 PM
Replies: 5
Views: 2,586
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Military Organization

The US Army has formal sections as well, but with the different connotations from that in the British Commonwealth as noted. These were and in some cases still are formalized in many units as part...
Forum: TO&Es February 11th, 2010, 02:23 PM
Replies: 11
Views: 8,968
Posted By thatguy96
Re: M1 Abrams variants

Fabio Prado's Armor Site (http://id3486.securedata.net/fprado/armorsite/abrams.htm) has a pretty good set of pages on all this as well.
Forum: TO&Es January 29th, 2010, 05:08 PM
Replies: 132
Views: 57,842
Posted By thatguy96
Re: MRAPs and a couple of general questions.

Here we go again:

Netherlands / RG-31 Nyala / Late 2006 / 2+6 / link (http://www.casr.ca/bg-apv-nyala-dutch.htm)
Netherlands / Bushmaster MPV / October 2006 / ? / link...
Forum: TO&Es January 29th, 2010, 04:22 PM
Replies: 132
Views: 57,842
Posted By thatguy96
Re: MRAPs and a couple of general questions.

I had the same problem trying to put in info about British, Dutch, and Canadian MRAPs. I really should make the post again, but I got frustrated initially and bailed on it.
Forum: TO&Es January 27th, 2010, 12:19 PM
Replies: 764
Views: 381,722
Posted By thatguy96
Re: APC Development and related topics.

Here's another article (http://www.quarry.nildram.co.uk/WLIP.htm) on the subject of the FRES/WFLIP programs.
Forum: TO&Es January 22nd, 2010, 12:45 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 4,515
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

That's why I said relative heh. The USMC more or less had the same type of helicopters available to them as the Army did. The Army pressed ahead because of constant Air Force resistance to its...
Forum: TO&Es January 21st, 2010, 06:01 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 4,515
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

The only point I was trying to make was that the USMC had the relative luxury of making such a decision, while the Army did not. They could debate the merits of fixed-wing attack aircraft, while the...
Forum: TO&Es January 21st, 2010, 02:14 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 4,515
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

This is probably more accurate. There seemed to be some debate over whether or not this had made it to Korea. It probably is a product of things getting conflated. The test was no doubt a product...
Forum: TO&Es January 21st, 2010, 01:38 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 4,515
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

The US Army is known to have tested a modification to the H-13 involving an M20 Super Bazooka in Korea. How extensive these tests were is unclear.

On Page 54 in Whirlybirds, there is mention of...
Forum: TO&Es January 21st, 2010, 01:29 PM
Replies: 10
Views: 4,515
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Early U.S. Army armed helos

The US Army was in the process of testing a wide array of weapons between 1956 and 1960. None of these were fielded in any operational capacity.

Some of the kits had been approved for a wide...
Forum: Mods January 20th, 2010, 12:55 PM
Replies: 89
Views: 44,223
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

On 17 August 1964, HMX-1 is directed to begin work on what would become the TK-1 kit. The kit was developed it 2 weeks and a demo flight firing first occurred on 8 September 1964. The first kits...
Forum: Mods January 20th, 2010, 11:30 AM
Replies: 89
Views: 44,223
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

Hmm, I have the problem regardless of what method I choose. What browser are you using?
Forum: Mods January 19th, 2010, 11:16 PM
Replies: 89
Views: 44,223
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

That's one of about a half dozen reports I want to get a hold of. Its available for download online from the USMC website. However, there seems to be an issue somewhere along the line. I try and...
Forum: Mods January 19th, 2010, 07:59 PM
Replies: 89
Views: 44,223
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

Its interesting that the .30 cal system is in the notes like that in my opinion. The Army didn't start doing testing on the systems that would lead to the XM1 until well after the Korean War.

Do...
Forum: Mods January 19th, 2010, 04:58 PM
Replies: 89
Views: 44,223
Posted By thatguy96
Re: Suhiir's Revised USMC OOB #13

This is interesting, since I wasn't aware that the USMC retained any of its UH-1Es in anything but a training capacity (TH-1Es) after the introduction of the UH-1N in 1971. The upgrading of the...
Showing results 26 to 50 of 500

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.