|
|
|
 |

November 28th, 2001, 06:29 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 105
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Blamed Sabotage
Is it possible that the Messages your counter intelligence department gives you are wrong, or in other words, is there such a thing as blamed sabotage in SE IV, like it was in SE III?
Gorgo
|

November 28th, 2001, 07:17 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 817
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
I think there is, but I am not going to bank on it.
|

November 28th, 2001, 09:20 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
Comm mimic forces you to choose an empire to blame it on, but I can't think of any others that would work that way.
__________________
Things you want:
|

November 29th, 2001, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
i think the question is not "can you intentionally frame someone for your hostile intel?"
rather, i think it is "is it possible that your minister is ever randomly WRONG about who they report the source of a hostile intel project to be?"
my answer is "i have no clue, whatsoever." But there are many here more wise than I.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

November 29th, 2001, 02:21 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
I'm pretty sure that they will either finger the correct instigator, or not mention any.
Still, I'm not 100% sure. A good test for this would be to start a 3-player game, and max out on intel production. Player 2 bombards player 1, player 3 is idle.
Player 1 uses varying amounts of counter-intel, and watches to see if anything ever seems to come from player 3.
__________________
Things you want:
|

November 29th, 2001, 04:56 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Rosario, Argentina
Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
quote: Originally posted by Puke:
rather, i think it is "is it possible that your minister is ever randomly WRONG about who they report the source of a hostile intel project to be?"
I've seen it happen. My minister tellimg me I'm sabotaged by someone I know has 0 intel points, he must be wrong.
|

November 29th, 2001, 05:05 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
"My minister tellimg me I'm sabotaged by someone I know has 0 intel points, he must be wrong."
Not always. You can get intelligence points by trade (partnership treaty) and I don't these points show up in the listings unless you are the player using them.
He'd still need to have intel researched to do the attack though.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

November 30th, 2001, 02:53 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Blamed Sabotage
Blamed sabotage/intel projects is one of the features from SE III that I miss the most in SE IV (after selecting individual starting technology levels).
I do not understand why MM did drop this in SE IV, although you have a very potent (even too potent) intel project in SE IV that will make two empires go to war against each other: communication mimic.
But still it would be nice to make intel projects (at a higher cost of course) without letting the victim know you did it!
[ 29 November 2001: Message edited by: Q ]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|