|
|
|
|
 |
|
March 1st, 2009, 02:26 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Ok if a Flaming weapons bless counts as a Magic weapon but only the Fire damage portion of the attack counts as magic then if a unit was Ethereal And also had 100% Fire resist would the Flaming weapons actually hit the unit all the time or would the Ethereal portion work so that he was only hit 25% of the time since the FR would presumably counter the Flaming weapons???
|
March 1st, 2009, 06:05 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
I'm pretty sure second part is correct. Only fire damage is magic, bless doesn't actually make initial weapon damage type magic.
|
March 1st, 2009, 06:36 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Oh, I would have said the opposite. Needs a test I guess!
|
March 1st, 2009, 09:20 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Quote:
Originally Posted by llamabeast
Oh, I would have said the opposite. Needs a test I guess!
|
I would guess with you llama - when the unit is blessed, it says magic weapons.
Additionally, jag warriors tear through ethereal faster than I think can be explained merely by only the fire portion being magical. |
March 1st, 2009, 10:26 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Easy to test conclusively, does it pop mistform under the same conditions?
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|
March 2nd, 2009, 08:39 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
When I once played (and in the end won) as Mictlan with W9D9 and was facing a high-defense\MR Vampire Queen under mistform, my jags never managed to dispel it while they could hit that 1HP from time to time. I understood it so that as she resisted that 2 AN+MR damage, their weapon stopped being magic.
|
March 2nd, 2009, 08:58 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
yes, ano is correct, I believe.
so 100% FR will negate the magicality of the weapon, and ethereality will operate. However, chrisp's observation is also the case, IME, ie. that w/ operative flaming weapons the regular attack also is fully effective against ethereal targets.
I wouldn't think that 75% FR would stop the regular attack being efficacious against ethereality, but I am not sure.
|
March 2nd, 2009, 11:18 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Flaming Weapons only add the Fire secondary effect. It does NOT make the base weapon magic.
Test results of F10 blessed jaguar warriors against fog-warriored Abyssian infantry.
Note that this is fundamentally different than Flaming Arrows. Flaming missiles are magic AND have the Fire secondary effect.
Cheers,
cleveland
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to cleveland For This Useful Post:
|
|
March 4th, 2009, 10:39 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleveland
Flaming Weapons only add the Fire secondary effect. It does NOT make the base weapon magic.
Test results of F10 blessed jaguar warriors against fog-warriored Abyssian infantry.
Attachment 7849
Note that this is fundamentally different than Flaming Arrows. Flaming missiles are magic AND have the Fire secondary effect.
Cheers,
cleveland |
Ah this makes sense really because Flaming Arrows actually switches the weapon on the unit, which is why Flaming arrows does not work with some ranged weapons because they do not have an enchanted counterpart.
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
March 3rd, 2009, 04:30 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethereal + 100% FR vs. Flaming weapon bless
Cleveland, you are too pro.
Can I be like you?
Jazzepi
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hexxagon Champion!
Hybrid Mode