|
|
|
 |

September 17th, 2002, 08:02 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
A Questionaire - redux
Quote:
This is a questionaire addressed mainly to the SE veterans - but all may participate. If you decide to participate - please answer truthfully. No strategic misinformation please.
|
On a scale of 1-10 with '0' being 'no value' plz rate the importance of the following (in your experience) in SEIV:
Weapon or Facility -- Value/Strategic/Tactical
- Tractor/repulse beam -- NA/__/__
- Shields -- NA/__/__
- Emissive armor -- NA/__/__
- Scattering armor -- NA/__/__
- Stealth armor -- NA/__/__
- Cloaking -- NA/__/__
- Tachyon (weapon destroying) cannon -- NA/__/__
- Ion Dispersal (engine destroying) cannon -- NA/__/__
- Frigates -- NA/__/__
- APB cannon -- NA/__/__
- Null space cannon -- NA/__/__
- Do you use training facilities and why?
- do you research Computer Complexes and why??
- Master computer -- NA/__/__
-- if you use an MC, do you add an Auxillary Bridge? -- Y/N
I add an AB to my larger ships with MC since MCII only costs 20kt and the AR 10kt. I do that in the event that the ship gets infected with a virus.
- Good idea or bad and why?
- Smallest ship with QR -- __?
- Do you make mixed weapon ships and why?
- Do you make only specialized ships and why?
- Do you mix shields and armor?
- What's your favorite set-up if so? That is - proportions of each. Type used?
- How is this ideal compromised by ship size? That is - what do you sacrifice if you have to?
- Is there a level at which shields are preferred over armor?
Thanks! 
[ September 18, 2002, 23:25: Message edited by: Elowan ]
__________________
 'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|

September 17th, 2002, 08:28 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,048
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A Questionaire - redux
Quote:
Originally posted by Elowan:
This is a questionaire addressed mainly to the SE veterans - but all may participate. If you decide to participate - please answer truthfully. No strategic misinformation please.
|
First part: On a scale of 1-10 with '0' being 'no value' plz rate the importance of the following (in your experience) in SEIV:
Weapon or Facility -- Value/Strategic/Tactical
- Long Range Scanners -- NA/5/0
- ECM unit -- NA/10/10
- Combat sensor -- NA/10/10
- Tractor/repulse beam -- NA/5/5
- Scattering armor -- NA/6/6
- Stealth armor -- NA/7/7
- Cloaking -- NA/9/9
- Tachyon (I think you mean ionic) (engine destroying) cannon -- NA/8/8
- Frigates -- NA/5/5
- APB cannon -- NA/8/8
- Null space cannon -- NA/6/6
Second part:
A) Name your favorite ship type/size and why.
It depends; Battleships and dreadnoughts both get the heavy weapon mount; dreads trade off movement for a couple extra weapons (or extra shields/armor). So they're both pretty good attack ships; however, the punch of a single baseship is fun to watch. Too bad they have such high combat penalties.
For transports, I like medium transports for most jobs - big enough to carry a useful amount of pop/sats/mines/drones, but not so big that it's difficult to fill all the cargo space. I use large transports mainly for troop transport or filling ring/sphereworlds with population.
Frigates & Destroyers make for good stellar manipulation craft (well, for lower-level components); other support ships (dedicated PDC or supply) are generally a size or two smaller than the main attack ships. Obviously, cruiser hull is perfect for spaceyard ships; light cruiser works pretty well for repair bays.
B) How far do you research propulsion and why?
To Quantum Engine I (level 10, I think); best movement bonus, and by the time I get that far on the tech tree I'm not generally concerned about resources, so researching the Last two levels of engines has little benefit.
C) Do you use training facilities and why?
Sometimes; typically if the AI has serious combat bonuses I'll use training to even the playing field. I don't get much time to play, so I avoid multiplayer and don't feel terribly guilty about using advantages that the AI doesn't use.
Thanks! 
__________________
L++ Se+++ GdY $++ Fr C+++ Csc Sf Ai AuO M+ MpTM S Ss RRSHP+ Pw- Fq->Fq+ Nd+++ Rp G++ Mm++ Bb---
|

September 17th, 2002, 08:47 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A Questionaire - redux
Weapon or Facility -- Value/Strategic/Tactical
- ECM unit -- NA/10/10
- Combat sensor -- NA/10/10
- Tractor/repulse beam -- NA/5/5
- Scattering armor -- NA/8/8
- Stealth armor -- NA/8/8
- Cloaking -- NA/7/7
- Tachyon (engine destroying) cannon -- NA/3/3
- Frigates -- NA/5/5
- APB cannon -- NA/5/5
- Null space cannon -- NA/8/8
Second part:
A. Name your favorite ship type/size and why.
Dreadnaughts. They have good size which makes them pretty affordable (not to big, not to small). I hate spending 5 turns to crank out a ship. I can usually stock up a Dreadnaught right to the brim and have one built in 3 turns.
B. How far do you research propulsion and why?
I usually research propulsion as far as I can go (Quantum III is the highest isn't it?). Why? Why not. Never hurts to have better engines than your enemy
C. Do you use training facilities and why?
I haven't used training facilities yet. I almost never let the comp do my battles for me, so if i'm not relying on the AI to do my fighting, then there's no point in researching Training Facilities.
Thanks for helping me kill some time at work! 
|

September 17th, 2002, 08:53 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: West Coast - USA
Posts: 417
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A Questionaire - redux
training facilities impact tactical and strategic combat. Whether you or the AI runs your ships in a battle.
>C. Do you use training facilities and why?
> I haven't used training facilities yet. I almost never let the comp do my battles
> for me, so if i'm not relying on the AI to do my fighting, then there's no point
> in researching Training Facilities.
__________________
--
AJC
|

September 17th, 2002, 09:01 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: A Questionaire - redux
Elowan:
This is probably a stupid question, but do you mean "Strategic Combat" and "Tactical Combat", or "Out of Combat" and "In Combat"?
|

September 17th, 2002, 09:06 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A Questionaire - redux
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Elowan:
This is probably a stupid question, but do you mean "Strategic Combat" and "Tactical Combat", or "Out of Combat" and "In Combat"?
|
Good question. I meant in combat - strategic and tactical, but forgot about LR scanner out of combat.
The frigate question is more general.
__________________
 'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|