Quote:
Originally Posted by Suhiir
Quote:
Originally Posted by troopie
Suggestion: We are constantly hearing what this or that organisation is GOING to do. Let us wait until they actually DO it.
troopie
|
Part of the problem has always been WinSMPBTs end date is in the future.
So we're constantly looking at what's planned then later what's actually implemented.
|
Have the end date set in the future show be a good thing since it allows things to change, as we are talking about with the fighters and who is buying what etc...to me if one branch is no longer using X for something then to me that should be reflected in the OOBs. Now with USMC, sure they could still call on Navy F18s but that might not be doctrine and that is where we seem to gloss over or so to me it seems, country X stops using a doctrine and that means certain vehicles, fighters, weapons are no longer used in the same manner, so IMO, the stop date is a reflection of that. Can a LAWs rocket stop a current front-line MBT? Sure, engine hit or track/road wheels taken out or that lucky hit that just happens. Is it standard practice to use a LAWs rocket to take on a T80 or M1? No, however, it can be done, but no one is using that weapon system anymore to do it, with the very few exceptions of terrorist or low-end rebels.
Might not be the best example but the point is if doctrines change then certain things won't be available to a country after a certain date.