|
|
|
 |

December 21st, 2002, 12:54 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Mines, Satellites and Fighters oh my!
Regarding:
Quote:
- Cost (to maintain and re-supply)
|
No units have maintenance cost.
Supply is unlimited for all units except fighters (and drones, but we are not talking about drones). Fighter re-supply is free also, but it requires either going to a planet with a Resupply Depot (facility) or landing and relaunching the fighters on a carrier or planet without a Resupply Depot.
Slick
__________________
Slick.
|

December 21st, 2002, 01:40 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Satellites and Fighters oh my!
Quote:
Originally posted by Echo Mirage:
I wanted to hear some of your opinions on the differences between these three units for wormhole defence?
I suppose you have a few things to consider:
- Cost (to research and to build)
- Cost (to maintain and re-supply)
- Flexibility (fighters are reactive and mobile, mines are cheap? satellites can be re-deployed.)
Any analysis would be greatly appreciated, I am yet a young Praetor in the Human Imperium, I could use some battle strategies and unti analysis!
Thanks!
|
You start the game with satellites. The next two levels are pretty easy to research. Their construction cost is not very much. They are quite effective with the mounts given in the default game. If they could still be scattered in more than ONE frickin' group per location they'd be fantastic. It's just too easy for a ship to get away from a single stack of satellites. Other than this, they are quite good for warp point defense.
Mines are quite cheap to research and to build. The reason they are cheap to research is that there is no purpose to the second and third levels. Small mines are the best thing to use. Don't bother with medium and large mines. They always hit, so what matters is the efficiency of your resource usage. A mine cannot be 'partially' expended. It blows up for full damage no matter what the target is. Large mines end up 'wasting' damage because of the larger granularity of the damage allocated. Small mines do just as much damage but in smaller increments so less is wasted on 'overkill' with small ships. As of this Version of SE IV, there is no technology to make mines more (mine enhancements) or less (ship defense) effective so there are no disadvantages to offset the efficiency advantage of the smaller mines. In fact, the greater numbers of smaller mines are also an advantage against sweepers.
Fighters are indeed expensive to research. They are also more expensive than satellites to build. Their mobility and flexibility are quite excellent, though. They do run out of supplies eventually but a base full of fighter bays is pretty cheap to build. A combination of satellites and fighters is excellent. The fighters can pursue weak ships that try to run away, while the satellites provide heavier firepower to assist the fighters against any powerful ships that appear.
|

December 21st, 2002, 02:46 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Satellites and Fighters oh my!
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
All of those become useless given enough time in MP games. They can be useful against those that are not prepared for them (eg: someone only puts one PDC on each warship). Ample (2-3 per ship) PDCs will slaughter fighters and satellites easily, and Mine Sweepers are not very expensive. It is really easy to get enough to sweep 100 mines in a fleet (5 light cruisers with Sweeper IIs will do it). In the early game, these units are indeed useful, but they decline in strength steadily as the game progresses.
|
Good points, but something of an exaggeration.
If every enemy fleet needs to be able to sweep 100 mines, then you've got the enemy to invest and to concentrate forces.
If all of the enemy's ships have 2-3 PDC on them, that's a signifigant investment of space and resources.
If the fighters have high-tech shields on them, they can each absorb one or two PDC hits. It therefore starts to become possible to overcome PDC, also when combined with seekers and drones to also absorb PDC.
The reasons I would say it is an exaggeration to say these units become useless at higher tech levels, are:
1) They still get the enemy to deploy resources to counter them.
2) They cost zero maintenance, so if you've built up your fleet to your maintenance limit, they don't count against that important limit.
3) In large quantities, they can be quite powerful. A pile of satellites or fighters, stacked full of defenses and weapons, sitting on the right side of a warp point, can do a lot of damage, and can tip the scales of a battle.
PvK
|

December 21st, 2002, 07:46 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Satellites and Fighters oh my!
I agree with you PvK.
IMHO fighters and sats keep their use even in late games. The key point as you said is "large numbers". 50 fighters are completely useless against a fleet of 20 or 30 ships but if you have 1000 large fighters with shields in Groups of 30 or even 50 you have a tremendous firepower and won't loose too many fighters.
Sats are great as quick defense for warp points when you expand. Just move the sats with your sat layers to the new front line.
Minesweeping is however IMHO too cheap. There has been a topic about that some months ago and I increased the cost of the minesweeping components dramatically in my mod. And to make larger mines interesting I reduced the effect and the cloaking level of the smaller mines.
[ December 21, 2002, 05:49: Message edited by: Q ]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|