OT: Movies You Have Seen Lately

narf poit chez BOOM · #1 November 29th, 2003, 09:19 AM

ok, but don't most action movie's have problems? and, as i just thought, in T3 they remembered to run out of amunition and reload.

se5a · #2 November 29th, 2003, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Atrocities:
Now for a good movie, see Pirates of the Carrabian. Goooood Movie.

*agrees*

Atrocities · #3 November 29th, 2003, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
ok, but don't most action movie's have problems? and, as i just thought, in T3 they remembered to run out of amunition and reload.

Ya, that is always a nice thing to see in a movie. Too bad they never show how a true gun on auto climbs. If you have ever shot one, and I have many, you would know that you don't shoot a gun and not get recoil, unless its a 22 or something.

Still, they did do a nice job on a lot of the movie, and I think it is worth a rental or dvd cost.

Atrocities · #4 November 29th, 2003, 10:23 AM

Has any one seen master and commander yet? Or how about Missing?

deccan · #5 November 29th, 2003, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
just saw t3. don't know what the complaints are about. sure, it was a gun-packed action-fest with a little philosophy on the side, but that's what 1 and 2 where. and the T-X might not have looked as dangerous as the T-101, but they don't have as much practice making women look dangerous. all in all, good action flick.

The main problem as I see it is that T2 broke new ground. The T-1000 was cool, deadly and the effects looked really, really good and smooth (remember the T-1000 being crystallized and smashed only to reform? remember it melding with the chequered floor? remember the cool moves it made in combat by changing its shape?). T3 looks like a throwback by comparison, with bad acting, cheap-looking effects and the much-touted TX was simply unconvincing and weak-seeming.

gravey101 · #6 November 29th, 2003, 03:01 PM

Yes, saw Master and Commander Last week. I really liked it but not sure it will appeal to everyone's tastes. It is a period that I am particularly interested and it was very well done IMO. The action scenes were excellent, but if you are expecting 24 hours of action you will be dissapointeed. Probably 2/3 of the movie is slower, though none the less enjoyable _if_ you are interested in that period of history. Crowe and the rest of the cast do a fine job.

gregebowman · #7 December 1st, 2003, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by deccan:

quote:
Originally posted by narf poit chez BOOM:
just saw t3. don't know what the complaints are about. sure, it was a gun-packed action-fest with a little philosophy on the side, but that's what 1 and 2 where. and the T-X might not have looked as dangerous as the T-101, but they don't have as much practice making women look dangerous. all in all, good action flick.

The main problem as I see it is that T2 broke new ground. The T-1000 was cool, deadly and the effects looked really, really good and smooth (remember the T-1000 being crystallized and smashed only to reform? remember it melding with the chequered floor? remember the cool moves it made in combat by changing its shape?). T3 looks like a throwback by comparison, with bad acting, cheap-looking effects and the much-touted TX was simply unconvincing and weak-seeming.

The main problem with T3 is that James Cameron had nothing to do with the film. I think Gale Anne Hurd got the rights to the Terminator franchise after she divorced James Cameron. so therefore, the storyline was probably like nothing Cameron would have come up with. After T2, I would have like them to explore the future and see how John Conner became the legend that made Skynet want to kill him in the past. The movie itself was ok. I liked the Terminatrix, but if you read the T2 trilogy of books by S.M. Stirling, there was a much better villainess in those books (and a much better storyline, IMO). Hopefully, if another sequel is made, Cameron will have more of an influence in its production.