|
|
|
|
 |
January 22nd, 2003, 01:12 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 407
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
I like your mod as well. I think it adds a lot to the game, and won't play a game unless I can have an asteroid field in my home system.
Brovo on a job well done I.F.
|
January 22nd, 2003, 04:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
Ok, I'll add my prise as well. 
Great job with the Q mods Fyron, I use them in every game I play. Can't live without them now. 
Oh, just for your information, I voted 9 for the standard and 10 for the deluxe.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
|
January 22nd, 2003, 06:06 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 858
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
Well, I've played a whole two turns in FQM (a take-over) and I love it! Like the others, I will be looking to use in my own games in future.
Just one tiny thing. I had a ship stationary in one system, an ordinary looking system. The ship kept moving around and I knew I hadn't moved it. So I clicked on a blank spot in the system to get its details and sure 'nuf, "ships will be moved one square in any direction". I would never have thought to look for this without the hint of that wandering ship, in this ordinary looking system. Maybe some sort of indicator for this could be added.
... Hmm, I think I'll avoid putting in ship and fleet training there. LOL
Kim
__________________
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, teach.
Those who can't teach, slag.
http://se4-gaming.net/
|
January 22nd, 2003, 06:12 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
Well considering you already have plenty of ego, I think that I will just keep my opinion to myself.
mlmbd   |
January 22nd, 2003, 06:49 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
Needless to say I love it also. My favorite aspect is the "surprise" factor.
What do other people like / love aobut them?
|
January 22nd, 2003, 08:18 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
Quote:
Originally posted by Grandpa Kim:
"ships will be moved one square in any direction".
Kim
|
Don't make the mistake I did and launch fighters in that system either. They will never land again. 
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
|
January 22nd, 2003, 09:03 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Another FQM Poll
I always liked the extra moons in the map mod. But, I don't like how the all have atmospheres, a few would be nice, maybe 50-50, but not so many.
The asteroid belts are nice, good for remote mining, but they make the system too busy. And what if you turn them all into huge planets? That's too much real estate. This shouldn't happen in every system.
But I really like the damaging asteroid fields, shield boosting storms, all that cool stuff
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode