|
|
|
 |

February 2nd, 2003, 05:05 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
Well the numbers are in. Races that take 100% or less in both attack and defense win 100% of the time. This highly statistically relevent fact based on my two KOTH games. So there are ways to do it. 
|

February 2nd, 2003, 07:03 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
Ok, ok DavidG, thanks for the proof!
No one is disputing that you can win on PBW or in KOTH without combat stacked settings...
What does matter is what settings your opponent is using.
Let us know the outcome after you have faced a 125/125/berserker, and I'm sure you will eventually. You may be surprised!
|

February 2nd, 2003, 07:14 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
Quote:
Originally posted by Stone Mill:
Let us know the outcome after you have faced a 125/125/berserker, and I'm sure you will eventually. You may be surprised!
|
Ha not likely!! I already got enough surprises Last game. After this discussion I'll be taking that too. Maybe when I get smacked down to the bottom of the hill I'll try that.
I think you are probably right in this thread. I haven't played enough one on one games to know. I do know that not choosing 125/125 etc does not absolutly guarantee a loss as so many seem to be implying.
|

February 2nd, 2003, 07:22 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
For what it's worth, David G's Last game he was a 100/100 scientist, and his opponnent was a 120/110/worker. Not 125/125 to be sure, but pretty compelling evidence that a deficency in those two stats is not a guarantee of defeat.
Of course if your mind is already made up on the basis of numerical comparisons then real world experience is not likely to influence your opinion much. But that's ok too.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

February 2nd, 2003, 07:54 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
For what it's worth, David G's Last game he was a 100/100 scientist, and his opponnent was a 120/110/worker. Not 125/125 to be sure, but pretty compelling evidence that a deficency in those two stats is not a guarantee of defeat.
Geoschmo
|
That's like saying playing blackjack once you hit on a 19, drew a 2, and won. Compelling evidence that hitting on a 19 doesn't guarantee a loss. Of course it doesn't guarantee a loss, but it still isn't a very good idea.
|

February 11th, 2003, 11:11 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
this whole thread means that 20/20/berserker is a default settings? I don't like it. I will ask my next opponent to play at least without berserker or reducing some other setings. This becomes not very interesting when the victory is defined by your starting position. 
|

March 10th, 2003, 11:09 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: KOTH: Attack of the Clones
Just resurrecting this thread for reference.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|