|
|
|
 |

February 2nd, 2003, 01:31 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
geo, my major point is MIN/maxing. i know what you are saying, but then again - something that requies early kill, special strategies, banding together isnt too good. at all.
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

February 2nd, 2003, 01:34 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
Banding together? I thought KOTH was one on one with no AIs.
Other PBW games are of course a different story, I guess.
__________________
It's all just a perspective of matter.
|

February 2nd, 2003, 02:58 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
Quote:
Originally posted by couslee:
Banding together? I thought KOTH was one on one with no AIs.
Other PBW games are of course a different story, I guess.
|
You are correct for KOTH. But Taera's concern seems to be that these min/max strategies will become widespread and used in all SEIV games.
Quote:
Originally posted by Taera:
geo, my major point is MIN/maxing. i know what you are saying, but then again - something that requies early kill, special strategies, banding together isnt too good. at all.
|
Taera, every strategy requires something to counter it. And not every strategy is good against every other strategy. What exactly would you like to see happen? It is not clear from your comments.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

February 2nd, 2003, 04:54 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
I agree with Taera's frustration somewhat, as I have posted in the thread I started (KOTH: Attack of the clones). But I don't think it is cheating.
I don't think it is right to keep beating the wind out of newbies who get discouraged because their ships can't hit. But most players here are top notch and don't mind giving out strategy tips, and telling them why they are doing poorly.
I'd rather it weighed more heavily on the tactics and decisions you made during the game, and not so much on how you made your race. And it's a shame that an "average race" (without the fundamentals, so to speak) would get pounded 99% of the time against a 20/20/berserker.
Originally posted by Geo:
Quote:
But would a 110/110/merchant? Could his concentration in economics make up the difference? Possibly, if he is a skilled player.
|
Hmm. I would qualify that "possibly" as very slim against a 20/20/berserker. The math is still extremely unfavorable in your example.
|

February 2nd, 2003, 04:57 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
Taera,
I've been trying to test those settings you listed in the thread. However, you appear to have 2 too many of them. Which of them are redundant or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Ken
|

February 2nd, 2003, 05:28 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
Sounds like I need to finish my balance mod. 
|

February 2nd, 2003, 06:00 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Fundamentals and Gamey
PvK, my Adamant Mod borrowed a lot of ideas from the Balance Mod. 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|