|
|
|
 |

February 16th, 2003, 05:01 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
Well, the if go to __very__ high atom numbers, and I mean ___very____ high, we can end up in neutron star. Now, if we make a quantum leap of faith, we'l move from the electromagnetic form of life, that is us, to atomic, or "strong force" universe. This hypothetical form of existance will be in different time and space scale, almost without any potential contact with our universe. Truly alien.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

February 16th, 2003, 05:08 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 391
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
to paraphrase Q "I would simply alter the physical laws of the universe". then we can have any type of lifeform we want that is capable of living in any type of atmosphere. who says that SEIV has to take place in our reality?
__________________
The vastness of space and time, and I end up here?
|

February 16th, 2003, 05:21 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
[QB]Chlorine makes 0 sense for a life-supporting atmosphere. It is too reactive of an element and tends to destroy any molecules it comes in contact with. Complex, sentient lifeforms evolving on a chlorine atmosphere world would be too unbelievable.
QB]
|
Oxygen is much more reactive than chlorine. Therefore by your reasoning it makes 0 sense for it to be a life-supporting atmosphere.

__________________
Slick.
|

February 16th, 2003, 05:53 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,259
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
Umm, Fyron, you're assuming we can only have atoms with integral numbers of protons. What about element number 48.75? Hmmm? 
__________________
The Unpronounceable Krsqk
"Well, sir, at the moment my left processor doesn't know what my right is doing." - Freefall
|

February 16th, 2003, 06:20 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
Quote:
Originally posted by Krsqk:
Umm, Fyron, you're assuming we can only have atoms with integral numbers of protons. What about element number 48.75? Hmmm?
|
Although I would never assert that the absence of evidence is evidence of absence... I would point out that nothing like this has ever been observed. Additionally, under our current understanding of physics, protons are made up of smaller parts called quarks. Our current understanding, which is supported by experiment, says that these quarks are only stable in certain configurations. Thus, our current model of physics, which is strongly supported by experiment, does not allow for fractional numbers of protons.
However SE4 is a game where anything is possible.
Slick.
__________________
Slick.
|

February 16th, 2003, 06:59 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
Of course, this whole debate about the 'suitability' of one atmosphere or another for life is presuming that there are distinct 'types' of atmospheres. This is even more UNrealistic than trying to claim that life could exist in a predominantly chlorine atmosphere.  I hope that SE V will have much subtler gradations of 'suitability' to account for the highly variable composition of various elements that would exist in real atmospheres. Balancing atmospheric gases could be a field of terraforming all to itself. (As opposed to the very crude 'conVersion' currently offered.)
Then with temperature, gravity, and radiation levels we could finally have some believably realistic environmental management on our worlds.
|

February 16th, 2003, 07:33 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, tx
Posts: 391
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Atmospheres
sounds like you are talking about stars' planetary characteristics. just a sliding bar to determine where your races habitable/tolerable ranges are. no specific atmosphere, gravity or radiation selected.
__________________
The vastness of space and time, and I end up here?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|