|
|
|
 |

March 7th, 2003, 09:12 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,624
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
I think the current is not bad, but could use a few refinements to improve it, like most have suggested already.
I think it would be interesting if resources were consumed on a system-per-system level, i.e., whatever you build in that system comes from resources in that system. You could then have transports and stuff, but that might get a little too much work in a large empire unless it was automated...
|

March 7th, 2003, 09:16 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
I like the micromanagement. I don't want any games that (as said in another post) "you click 'end turn' until you've won" or something like that....  In fact, it makes great gameplay (IMO) when I miss something on my Last turn and it takes me a few turns to adapt (forget to restock carriers, etc) - makes it more realistic.
Yeah, end game turns take a while, but thats why I bought the game and takes up +90% of my gaming time....
|

March 7th, 2003, 09:24 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
Hey DavidG- you are right! My post is gone!?! 
|

March 7th, 2003, 09:44 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
Moderator- I'm sorry if I did something wrong, please let me know? I did not mean to offend anyone.
Maybe because I used the word h*ll? You know, the hot place? Was not aware this was forbidden?!?
|

March 7th, 2003, 09:50 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
Stone Mill, Do not worry. I do not believe Moderators deleted your post. It must be some message board glitch. Not long time ago we lost one mongth of posting in one thread ("unexplained misteries..."). There are strange things happening in cyberspace.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

March 7th, 2003, 10:17 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
Thanks, oleg. Strange days, indeed. Most peculiar, momma. 
|

March 7th, 2003, 10:35 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: What\'s your micromanagement tolerance level?
I think it's a matter of personal taste and interest what each player considers to be "mircomanagement", and what is instead "gameplay"!
If you're willing to use ministers, SE4 can involve only certain kinds of management, or even none at all. It's too bad the ministers aren't a bit more sophisticated and controllable.
SE4 can get to be overwhelming when you have a really large empire, though, and there are definite advantages to managing details. It can take hours of management each turn to get a large empire to the point where there are no more orders which could clearly be useful. On the other hand, especially if you queue orders in advance, use repeat orders, etc, you can also often do OK just mostly coasting. So, it depends on how much of a perfectionist you are, too. Do you really need to have everyone occupied at all times?
PvK
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|