|
|
|
 |

April 5th, 2003, 08:56 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
I’m not sure that all 25mm’s are chain guns. But it is a tank buster so long as the range is short
and it has access to the less armored areas of the T-72. Depleted Uranium cuts steel armor like
butter. And T-72’s are fire traps. The shell storage is problematic, and most units have had the interior bLast doors removed to improve loading reliability. The Soviets had trouble maintaining this system, so I doubt the Iraqi’s were able to keep them functioning. Also, many marks have die cast road wheels, which are susceptible to .5” fire. That has to be one of those “what where they thinking of” engineering blunders.
__________________
Think about it
|

April 5th, 2003, 09:13 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
Anyone else notice the poor condition of the Iraqi personal equipment? It’s a good thing that
they use AK’s. Most weapons would not function with that level of care. And in that gritty
environment, one would have to wonder at the level of functionality they retain. Also, their
storage activities are awful. I wonder how many duds they have with their RPG’s and mortars.
A dud in a mortar is a real ***** when it hangs in the tube, and I would think that a hang fire with an RPG could be an issue too. That thing lights off while you are removing it from the tube, and I bet you don’t count to ten with your fingers any more.
[ April 05, 2003, 07:14: Message edited by: Thermodyne ]
__________________
Think about it
|

April 5th, 2003, 04:43 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA
Posts: 921
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
Quote:
Originally posted by Thermodyne:
I’m not sure that all 25mm’s are chain guns. But it is a tank buster so long as the range is short
and it has access to the less armored areas of the T-72. Depleted Uranium cuts steel armor like
butter. And T-72’s are fire traps. The shell storage is problematic, and most units have had the interior bLast doors removed to improve loading reliability. The Soviets had trouble maintaining this system, so I doubt the Iraqi’s were able to keep them functioning. Also, many marks have die cast road wheels, which are susceptible to .5” fire. That has to be one of those “what where they thinking of” engineering blunders.
|
Interesting info on the T-72. I found this LINK for some information on the Bradley's gun system. It is the M242 Bushmaster 25mm chain gun. Apparently, they have developed some pretty potent ammo for it. 
__________________
My SEIV Code: L++++ GdY $ Fr+++ C-- S* T? Sf Tcp A%% M+++ MpT RV Pw+ Fq Nd- RP+ G++ Au+ Mm++(--)
Ursoids of the Galaxy, unite!
|

April 5th, 2003, 05:46 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
I am reminded of the historical scenario of the battle of Smolensk (a battle memorialized in the wonderful Avalon Hill game, Panzergruppe Guderian). The crux of the German strategy against the Russians was Enkesselment (encirclement) in which the rapidly moving panzer columns would outpace their own slower infantry divisions, and to some degree their own supply lines, in order to outflank the enemy dug into and around cities and towns. The Infantry would slowly come up and close the net, but for a time the panzers would be vulnerable as the irregular, "untried" Russian units that were bypassed would harrass and cut their supply lines.
|

April 5th, 2003, 06:09 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm
Great web site.
The t-72 is out classed in this war.
Now if the American's do attack Sryia...
What weapons do they have.
I assume t-72 's , variations of the t-55 , and modern artie..
Most likely on par with IDN
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|

April 5th, 2003, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
Quote:
Originally posted by tesco samoa:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm
Great web site.
The t-72 is out classed in this war.
Now if the American's do attack Sryia...
What weapons do they have.
I assume t-72 's , variations of the t-55 , and modern artie..
Most likely on par with IDN
|
BBC says this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/788180.stm
__________________
Think about it
|

April 5th, 2003, 06:41 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: [OT] Military (non-political) discussion of Iraq war
http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/syrscud.htm
Shakes head and thinks that these people are so stupid.
__________________
Think about it
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|