.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 7th, 2001, 10:03 PM

SunDevil SunDevil is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 250
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SunDevil is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

Good ideas LintMan!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 7th, 2001, 10:39 PM

E. Albright E. Albright is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
E. Albright is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

quote:
Originally posted by LintMan:
- I like Tenryu's idea of a facility you could build that would allow you to build more facilities (within limits of course).



This could be problematic (hence aforementioned your limits). While this would definately be interesting, you'd have to be careful with it, and it could be annoying to code. For starters, it'd almost have to be one-per-planet [for ea. type, at least: you could have Subterranean Habitation Caverens, Floating Cities, and Micro Pocket Dimensions (or whatever) all on the same planet for (1 fac. * planet size) ea., but not two Floating Cities].

Another point to remember is that any such facilities would by necessity have to be the Last things killed, 'cause Bad Things would happen if your 50-fac planet suddenly lost the Uber-Storage-Complex V that was giving it room for 25 of those facs... [in a sense, this could be a desirable thing ("Use da Smartbomz to collapse da filthy 'Umies' caverns!!!"), but distinguishing between facs which are and are not "underground" could be a hassle to code].

[This message has been edited by ealbright (edited 07 February 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 7th, 2001, 11:05 PM
dmm's Avatar

dmm dmm is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dmm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

Some famous billionaire rich guy (Rockefeller, JP Morgan?) was once asked how much money it would take to make him happy. He answered, "Just a little bit more."

In that fine tradition, I say, "More, MORE, MORE! More is better!" I want so many choices that I can't reasonably use them all in a single game. More research areas, more special race abilities, more facilities, more components, more choices. I want to be bewildered and overwhelmed. I want my community college to start offering courses on SEIV. I want to be able to put "Certified SEIV Expert" on my resume. In conclusion, let me just say:

"Mooooooooooooooore!"
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 8th, 2001, 03:07 PM

Spyder Spyder is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lee\'s Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 195
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Spyder is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

Personally, I LIKE lots of things to build & research. I didn't mind the tons of building & management in MOO2 & Civ. However, if there were a tool that would allow you to build a certain item on selected planets, all planets, etc, then this would be greatly simplified. But, overall, the more stuff, the better

I also thought that Civ's research tree, with each new discovery attributable to two or more previous discoveries, was much more fun than SEIV's research tree, and made your research strategy more difficult to plan out (and, of course, essentially, puzzle solving is what we're doing here...right?).

I also wish that their strategic combat system was a little less difficult to use...one thing that bugs me is having to click on the mini-map just to re-center the big map somewhere else...the ship's auto-pathing is poor also...

By the way...I am working on a complete research tree document and will publish it here when I'm done. It'll be in PowerPoint because I'm not an artist, I'm a computer geek Any artists out there can feel welcome to take the finished product and put it into some nice graphical form

Paul E. Mason
Senior VMS Systems Admistrator
__________________
Spyder, Chairman of the Arachnid Consortium
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 8th, 2001, 03:13 PM

Tenryu Tenryu is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Uranus
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tenryu is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?


Ealbright,

I do agree with your concerns and those of the others here regarding some limits. Isn't that true of everything?

In any case, not being a programmer myself nor having access to the mind of Aaron Hall, I have no idea how difficult it would be to code. I like to remember that in programming, like a magic show, you don't really have to do what your audience thinks you are doing. It just has to LOOK like you did it.

I can imagine, however, that this ability might be better implemented as a Vehicle only type.

For example:

Ability 1 type := Facility Space
Ability 1 Desc := BLAH-Blah-blah
Ability 1 Val 1 := { the facility family # goes here so that we can specify which facility family }
Ability 1 Val 2 := { the maximum number of facilities goes here }

I know there are a whole bunch of other issues, like most stuff, but, oh well, I am given to strange imaginings at times.


[This message has been edited by Tenryu (edited 08 February 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 8th, 2001, 05:25 PM
dmm's Avatar

dmm dmm is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dmm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

quote:
Originally posted by Spyder:
Personally, I LIKE lots of things to build & research. I didn't mind the tons of building & management in MOO2 & Civ.

I agree. I like micromanagement. I'd even like to be able to design cities like in SimCity! (SimSEIV? OK, that's extreme to the point of wierd, I know.) And I'd like to control space and land battles in fine detail.
BUUUUT, I also have to agree with the macro people here, that once your empire gets big the micro can get pretty tiresome. (Can anyone say "carpal tunnel syndrome?") That's where good AI ministers come in.
quote:
Originally posted by Spyder:

However, if there were a tool that would allow you to build a certain item on selected planets, all planets, etc, then this would be greatly simplified. But, overall, the more stuff, the better


Yes and yes.
quote:
Originally posted by Spyder:

I also thought that Civ's research tree, with each new discovery attributable to two or more previous discoveries, was much more fun than SEIV's research tree, and made your research strategy more difficult to plan out ...


Never played Civ, but played SMAC, which is similar. I disagree with Spyder here. I found the Civ/SMAC research "net" idea restrictive -- at least the way it was implemented. I was forced to research almost everything in order to get the stuff I really wanted. So trading of research wasn't worthwhile, because everyone had most of the same stuff. And it was the same every time.
What I wouldn't mind, and which I think would add some fun complexity, would be the choice to have the research lines either all independent (as they are now), or to have them be interdependent (like in Civ/SMAC). But for interdependent I would want two additional options. First, I'd want the interdependence to be different each time. Or, even better, different for each empire. (Oh man, that would rock! Just think how that would affect trading! And how about a special racial ability that can ignore research prereqs?!) Second, I'd want to be able to set the granularity, meaning that I could set the number of interconnections anywhere from few to many.
quote:
Originally posted by Spyder:

By the way...I am working on a complete research tree document and will publish it here when I'm done.


Nice. Looking forward to it.
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 8th, 2001, 05:54 PM

E. Albright E. Albright is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
E. Albright is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Would anyone be interested in more planet development?

quote:
Originally posted by Tenryu:
I can imagine, however, that this ability might be better implemented as a Vehicle only type.


...and then we could have orbital city Bases, as well as obscenely massive Baseships (where the name isn't a misnomer)...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.