|
|
|
 |

April 21st, 2003, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 864
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Gryphin:
Alamsa is asmala spelled backwards and given a capital "A"
|
I should have been found that, it's a bit embarrassed!
__________________
'The surest sign that there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us.' Calvin and Hobbes
Are you tough enough to be the King of the Hill?
|

April 22nd, 2003, 12:44 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Gryphin:
I do need 100 percent acceptance or indifferance befor I can alter name.
|
You're welcome to use my name.
|

April 22nd, 2003, 12:54 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 58
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
quote: Originally posted by Slynky:
So, am I to understand swapping planets/ships and gifting them is acceptable play? (just need to know so we can plan accordingly )
|
Well, it would be an interesting concept to have a team game with no tech or ship swapping. Not sure exactly how that would play out actually. Maybe we should think/talk about it some. But definetly that's one thing that needs decided before the game starts. Personally I don't mind either way.
Geoschmo I don't mind either way either. I will say that I'm more in favor of swapping planets than I am of swapping ships. Exchanging planets seems more natural to me than exchanging ships. Races would naturaly tend to gravitate to planets that were good for them so it seems reasonable to me that several races working together would be willing to hand-off a planet more suited to their ally in exchange for like consideration. Ships seem more of a stretch. Races with perhaps wildy different physiologies, atmospheric requirements, mentalities, and design philosophies would seem ill suited to use each other's ships. But in the final analysis I don't care enough to take a stand one way or the other.
|

April 22nd, 2003, 05:06 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Gryphin:
Alamsa is asmala spelled backwards and given a capital "A"
< The Gryphin Gryns >
I do need 100 percent acceptance or indifferance befor I can alter name.
Would folks like a pair of carefuly placed truly dangerous sytems? These might be placed inbetween the two warring factions or off somewhare un important.
|
You may use my name if you wish (but please, no names like "Slynky's Toilet" )
As to dangerous systems? I'd just let the map generator handle it all. But if other players want something like that, I'll let them mention it.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 22nd, 2003, 05:20 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Well, concerning the colony/ship swapping, our side has stated:
Asmala: Prefer not to have it
Slynky: Prefer not to have it
Lord Chane: Don't care
Your side has stated:
geoschmo: Don't care
rextorres: Don't care
In my opinion, then, since no one voted as preferring colony/ship (etc.) swapping, it will not be allowed.
If that's the Last detail to be agreed upon, then I'll post a summary for the game and Gryphin can get started.
[ April 22, 2003, 19:25: Message edited by: Slynky ]
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 22nd, 2003, 05:25 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Lord Chane:
I don't mind either way either. I will say that I'm more in favor of swapping planets than I am of swapping ships. Exchanging planets seems more natural to me than exchanging ships. Races would naturaly tend to gravitate to planets that were good for them so it seems reasonable to me that several races working together would be willing to hand-off a planet more suited to their ally in exchange for like consideration. Ships seem more of a stretch. Races with perhaps wildy different physiologies, atmospheric requirements, mentalities, and design philosophies would seem ill suited to use each other's ships. But in the final analysis I don't care enough to take a stand one way or the other.
|
Again, reallistically speaking, I would tend to disagree. In an alliance, I think countrys (or empires) would tend to give away ships or trade ships much sooner than they would give a colony of their people (and have a colony containing another race given to them). I know if I was a member of a colony that was given to another empire, I'd be a bit upset. (well, of course, unless my leader was Saddam )
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

April 22nd, 2003, 09:48 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quadrant:
FQM 1.8 Std
Dense Paradise
Medium size
All warp points connected
Warp points located anywhere
Races:
Racial points 0
Technology level 0
No AI
3 Good starting planets
Starting resources 20,000
Player can view score of allied player
Technology:
All areas allowed
Tech cost medium
Miscellaneous:
No events
No ruins (can ruin the game…  )
1K ship limit
2K unit limit
All players must take rock/oxygen as planet type/atmosphere
Gifting or trading ships/colonies/units/population is not permitted
Email outside the game permitted
Victory Conditions:
Surrender
So, I guess we're ready to post a game unless somone has a problem with these settings. Gryphin, you da man!
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|