|
|
|
|
 |
April 24th, 2003, 02:07 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Hang on, I'll fix it.
Fixed
[ April 24, 2003, 01:13: Message edited by: Gryphin ]
|
April 24th, 2003, 02:11 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Gryphin:
Hang on, I'll fix it.
|
You're a prince among princes! And thanks again for hosting the game (and all that that responsbility has entailed  )
Oh, and glad to hear you're sober tonight  .
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
April 24th, 2003, 02:18 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
|
You're a prince among princes!
|
More like a joker among Jacks. |
April 24th, 2003, 02:30 PM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Once again showing initiative calm Commander Slynky has joined the game. The question in everyone’s mind, “Does he have what it takes to take what they have”?
I am still awaiting a decision on how many systems and who if anyone objects to unusual names. I’ll keep them clean.
Dose anyone in the forums have a system name they would like to see used?
|
April 24th, 2003, 02:49 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by Gryphin:
I am still awaiting a decision on how many systems and who if anyone objects to unusual names. I’ll keep them clean.
Dose anyone in the forums have a system name they would like to see used?
|
Your earlier post said 114 systems. I'll agree to 100 if geo thinks that's enough.
As to names, I've already indicated it's fine by me. I think the rest of the Black Hole Alliance has agreed, also. (Just no names like, Slynky's Black Hole, please  )
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
April 24th, 2003, 02:53 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
I totally agree. No way that I am going to go into Slynky's Black Hole, so if there is a system named that he will win by default. 
Number of systems doesn't really matter to me. I only brought it up as a matter of discusion. Once it's decided I can plan my strategy accordingly. As long as it's not so big that it takes us a month to find each other.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
April 24th, 2003, 03:06 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Challenge Match
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
I totally agree. No way that I am going to go into Slynky's Black Hole, so if there is a system named that he will win by default.
Geoschmo
|
As we can tell from this one item, any war updates to the match may be humorous!
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode