|
|
|
|
 |
May 17th, 2003, 08:39 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: France
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
Micro-Evolution: T(n+1)=T(n)+1
Origin of life: T(0)=0
Macro evolution: T(n)=n ?
|
May 17th, 2003, 09:08 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
So what were getting at is this:
Evolution (of any sort) can only apply once you have an (living?) organism that can copy itself almost perfectly (doesnt have to be a cell or anything we recognise today)
Micro evolution is short term, such as differences between wild and tame farm animals. It is evolution within the same "species"
Macro evolution is evolution over long term, such as differences between birds and mammals, plants and animals. Evolution between "species"
NB: I dont like the word "species", its not very accurate over evolutionary time. But i cant think of a better term.
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, I could conquer the world.
|
May 17th, 2003, 09:14 AM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
Heres a poser then:
Can non-living things evolve? E.g. Computer programs. What is actually needed for evolution?
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, I could conquer the world.
|
May 17th, 2003, 09:33 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: France
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
Quote:
Originally posted by Primogenitor:
Heres a poser then:
Can non-living things evolve? E.g. Computer programs. What is actually needed for evolution?
|
Of Course, else how could you have MC III from MC II ? 
[EDIT] Amd even more important, by who would the shrike have been created?
[ May 17, 2003, 08:37: Message edited by: StarBaseSweeper ] |
May 17th, 2003, 11:59 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
troops. evolution also means manuvers with troops.
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
May 18th, 2003, 12:52 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
"One minute it's used to describe the process of microevolution, and the next it's referring to the hypothesis of macroevolution--which indeed deals with the origin of species."
But not the origin of life, which is a different and much stickier problem.
|
Exactly. Krsqk just likes lumping all of biology together so he can dismiss it more easily.  j/k |
May 18th, 2003, 02:19 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: "Real" ringworlds
Gah! It's the evolution debate again!
*dogscoff runs screaming from the thread...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode