.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
The Star and the Crescent- Save $9.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 12th, 2001, 12:56 AM
raynor's Avatar

raynor raynor is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
raynor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

Fighters are incredibly powerful if built in sufficient numbers. If the AI doesn't put point defence cannons on its ships, then you can build six small fighters equipped with just the small anti proton beam at any of your planets in a *single* turn and utterly destroy any escort, frigate, or light cruiser which the AI may spend two to three turns building at a space yard planet.

They don't need to be built at a space yard so it is easy to spend all your excess resources building up quite a stockpile of these things. I figure that the average system can build at least 40 per turn. There are just too many advantages to list. You didn't need to build a space yard to start producing these fighters so you can start producing them the same turn you colonize the planet instead of waiting five turns. They don't require any maintenance so you can spend more resources on expansion. They don't effect your score. So, you can have enough fighters to utterly lay waste to the AI and still seem harmless--thus not invoking MEE. Fighters can leave planet orbit and attack targets inside the system. This is something that satellites and weapon platforms and mines can't do. Pack them on a carrier or a transport if you have a planet in the next system over, and you now have a mobile offensive force. Fighters are better than satellites because they are always on the correct side of the planet. They are better than WEP's because they can go out and meet the enemy. 40 small fighters can easily take on a cruiser or battle cruiser and destroy it. Remember that small fighters are incredibly hard to hit while packing quite a wollop...

Later in the game, the AI will put Point Defence cannons on its ships. But if you play an EA-like game and mass produce fighters, you'll quickly find that even putting your fighters in much more manageable Groups of 20 or more, you will easily be able to defeat AI ships with PD V cannons by englobing his ships. It seems that the PD cannons don't fire if neither your fighters nor the enemy ships move?
Fighters are much more convenient to build than mines, satellites or weapon platforms because a planet can launch an infinite number per turn, and then you can move the fighters around inside a system without using another ship as is required by the other unit types.

As you can see, I'm a very big advocate of fighters. Even before I installed the Mod Pack and observed the numbers of fighters the EA builds, I found fighters to be extremely powerful. Of course, a human player could easily counter my fighters by building ships with *only* PD V's on board. But he'll spend one heck of a lot more resources on maintenance than I will.

IMHO, you would be extremely surprised at how effective just the small fighter is. Playing a high bonus game against the current AI, I think you could probably play a game where you never leave your current system and stop researching after you get the small fighter with the small anti-proton. Once you get that, I might make the ridiculous claim that you could declare war on all your enemies and survive. Of course, that might be a little extreme. However, I *was* at war with THREE empires at once and survived. (Hopefully, get rid of the defense base bug, and I would have been toast!)

(Stepping down off the podium and stopping the auto-salesmen like pitch of fighters...)

---
Notes for those of you who don't spend more time playing the game than you do reading this forum.

1. MEE - Once you reach a certain score, which is influenced heavily by the number of ships and bases you have, all races in the game decide you are a threat, break their treaties and declare war on you. The game is much easier to win if everybody *loves* you. With careful diplomacy, you can maintain peaceful relations with everyone in the galaxy until the turn before you start laying waste to their colonies.

2. EA - Earth Alliance - Awesome race created by Mephisto which you can find in the Mod Pack 1.01 over in the Scenarios/Mods forum which is up a level from this one and down a few.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 12th, 2001, 10:57 AM

Tomgs Tomgs is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Winnetka, CA, USA
Posts: 357
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tomgs is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

I agree that fighters are very powerful if used correctly and it seems you do. I don't use them myself anymore because the micromanagement is very high with large numbers of fighters in combat and if you build a good infrastructure I don't think maintaince is a problem. Of course as you say if the computer building queue problems go away then this might change. Right now I can win without them so I usually ignore that tech. I do win against missle and fighter AI races that I meet in the game very easily and all it does is give me legendary ships from all the point defence hits I get.

So what I am saying is yes they are very good and against the computer they are probably unstoppable unless you mod the game to put more point defence in the ships. If you do that of course something else gets weaker so its a tradeoff. Against a human it won't work as well but you might win the first battles until his designs change sufficently to counter you. I Usually put at least 3 PD in any light cruiser and above when I fight seeker and fighter races and I don't think you could surround many of my fleeted ships with light fighters. My solo scouts however would die easily to that tactic. Of course large fighters with shields are able to take on larger ships and it takes a bit more to take them out. When I did use fighters I really liked the large fighters speed and in large enough Groups most ships would have trouble with them.

[This message has been edited by Tomgs (edited 12 February 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 13th, 2001, 03:02 AM
raynor's Avatar

raynor raynor is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
raynor is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

quote:
Against a human it won't work as well but you might win the first battles until his designs change sufficently to counter you. I Usually put at least 3 PD in any light cruiser and above when I fight seeker and fighter races and I don't think you could surround many of my fleeted ships with light fighters. My solo scouts however would die easily to that tactic.


In general, I agree with you. But because fighters don't pay maintenance, I wonder if it might not be a worthwhile sacrifice to lose tons and tons of fighters against point defence cannons rather than pay the maintenance on a fleet of ships.

For example, let's say you build a light cruiser equipped with PD V cannons and some shielding. In the simulator, this 7000 point ship can be overcome by 23,000 worth (about 75) small fighters. Is this trade worth it?

On the face of it, this trade looks pretty one-sided against the empire using fighters. But what happens to the balance if you consider the resources spent maintaining that ship. Over a period of 12 turns, the maintenance on that ship bumps its cost up above the cost of the fighters.

Of course, the next question would be: Can the fighter empire build enough fighters quickly enough--especially when he must spend three to four times as many minerals to equal one ship. It all depends on how long the other player has been maintaining his ships. I wonder if there might not be a point in time when it makes more sense to invest in fighters *even though* you are going to lose them in such large numbers against the enemy's PD cannons.

Makes you think, doesn't it?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 13th, 2001, 04:36 AM

JSnider JSnider is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: boiling springs, PA
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
JSnider is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

Use fghtrs, but more as 2ndry units to clean up after battle or pick off lone combatants that might sneak pass the front line .. still in general as originated in the game a fgthr (singleton) is useless. only good pt is can build 100s-1000s and not pay maint. don't like to use the englobe approach as seems somewhat unfair to take advantage of a minor prog bug ..
Have been considering mod'ng game to a certain extent to change individual fighters to rep squadrons or wings and scale up accordingly .. anyone else thinking of similar changes. this would allow me to build grps as 1 item deploy same accordingly and get rid of some of the micromanagement .. just wondering.

jsnider
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 13th, 2001, 04:51 AM

Drake Drake is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 202
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Drake is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

quote:
Originally posted by raynor:
Over a period of 12 turns, the maintenance on that ship bumps its cost up above the cost of the fighters.


You could always set your ship maintenance to zero and ignore using fighters completely...

Besides, if you really want to hurt them from a maintenance perspective, use engine overloading weapons on their ships and just leave them there if they don't have repair components or self-destructs and are in your territory. *evil grin*

-Drake
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 13th, 2001, 06:59 AM

Aussie Gamer Aussie Gamer is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 215
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Aussie Gamer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

I love using fighters, they rock.

But if you run a group of fighters into a minefield they don't Last long.

I run into a minefield of four mines, a "friend" put it there, and I lost all 21 fighters. Only one mine was used up. That's an ouch!!!

So for every attack there's a good defence..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 13th, 2001, 10:33 AM

Tomgs Tomgs is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Winnetka, CA, USA
Posts: 357
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tomgs is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Value of Fighters

quote:
Originally posted by raynor:
In general, I agree with you. But because fighters don't pay maintenance, I wonder if it might not be a worthwhile sacrifice to lose tons and tons of fighters against point defence cannons rather than pay the maintenance on a fleet of ships.



Well I would worry about that if maintaince ever slowed down my building but it doesn't unless I am building stellar manipulation and then if I blow up your star all your fighter go away anyway . The truth is if you build a good infrastructure maintaince is non existant because you are bringing in more minerals than you spend anyway. If I didn't build ships at every planet that wasn't building facilities the minerals would just be wasted and lost anyway so the maintaince is a plus because at least my minerals are useful.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.