Moo3 is a shareware now

[eddieballgame]

Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
"The Patch was quick to download & EASY to install per instuctions."

Uh-huh. How come the person you responded to couldn't get it to work then?

Why you asking me? You should be asking him. I think I read somewhere that he returned his cd. (maybe he forgot he needed an installed program to patch, I DON"T KNOW!) Personnaly I don't care, I just stated a fact. Why is it ok to spew nonsense about a game , but not ok to disagree about said nonsense? (btw, "nonsense" is my opinion )

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by eddieballgame:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
"The Patch was quick to download & EASY to install per instuctions."

Uh-huh. How come the person you responded to couldn't get it to work then?

Why you asking me? You should be asking him. I think I read somewhere that he returned his cd. (maybe he forgot he needed an installed program to patch, I DON"T KNOW!) Personnaly I don't care, I just stated a fact. Why is it ok to spew nonsense about a game , but not ok to disagree about said nonsense? (btw, "nonsense" is my opinion )

---

Friend, the patch that I downloaded was missing files. I had to download it four separate times and finally to get the whole thing I had to download it directly from MOO3 site. Ya I know, anything worth getting is best gotten from the developer. I have never had problems before and can only speculate that my problem was a fluke. Never the less, I did get the patch and yes it did install rather easily. Again as they should. That discussion is now over. On to the Game it’s self.

The game in my humble opinion is actually quite worthless and that is why I chose to uninstall it and send back the disks in peaces. QS, or now the blame is being shifted to Atari (?), got my money and in return ran laughing to the bank. I feel that it is only appropriate that I return their POS game to them and spread the word about how truly awful MOO3 actually is. And I do know what it is I am critiquing friend, one horribly implemented game that just happened to be named Master Of Orion 3.

[ June 11, 2003, 09:55: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by eddieballgame:

. This patch also made this game close to a classic. Without wasting my time revealing all the improvements, just visit the MOO3 websites for all the details.

Your right, this patch did in my opinion make the game a classic. A Classic what I will not post, but never the less it is most assuredly a classic. I just wish they would have fixed the fonts.

I do not mean to offend you, but IMHO MOO3 is not a good game.

[ June 11, 2003, 10:43: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by Captain Jean Luc Le Grand Chat:
Fair comment Atrocities but I couldn't resist a dig at my Chief Engineer from the TSSS Phong's HEad.

What is GalCiv like then?

GalCiv is a fun game that I would recommend to any one. I really enjoy playing it. I think that GalCiv and SEIV are two seperate games, and both are well suited to players. Now if they could just combine them, oooweee, that would be a game.

[Growltigger]

Hrothgar, thanks for your response.

GalCiv sounds interesting. How does the fleet combat work? is it a case of you getting a message that your 10 destroyers have had a fight with a couple of alien cruisers and have lost 3 ships or something like that. Other than technology, can you affect the combat in any way (like using the formations in SEIV)?

Does Galciv have ground combat? and how do the graphics compare to SEIV?

Given that I get little time to play multiplayer, a good AI game designed for single player sounds grand

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by Captain Jean Luc Le Grand Chat:
Hrothgar, thanks for your response.

GalCiv sounds interesting. How does the fleet combat work? is it a case of you getting a message that your 10 destroyers have had a fight with a couple of alien cruisers and have lost 3 ships or something like that. Other than technology, can you affect the combat in any way (like using the formations in SEIV)?

Does Galciv have ground combat? and how do the graphics compare to SEIV?

Given that I get little time to play multiplayer, a good AI game designed for single player sounds grand

GalCiv combat occurs during normal game play. Your ships encounter enemy ships and there is a face off. You watch it as it unfolds on the normal game screen. The ships are destoryed, but all you see is just one of your ships, regardless of how many are in the fleet, and one of the enemy ships, same applying.

When the battle is over, either your ships are still there, aside from the ones lost, or they are not in which case you lost the battle. The combat is not all that great, but it is designed that way to give the player a board game feel. I happen to think it works well.

GalCiv is not multiplayer, and the AI's seem to do well in keeping you going. The Metaverse (sp) is a good way to challenge yourself against other players by downloading hteir game style and essencially playing agaisnt them.

All in all I think GalCiv is a damn fine game and I hope you do buy it. But compared to SeIV, most players will find it kinda boring after a game or two.

[Hrothgar]

Atrocities covered space combat well. As for ground combat, first, there's no bombardment from space. Troop ships must land soldiers in order to take a planet [altho there may be, and I think there are, planet-destroying weapons at high tech levels. I haven't played in a while--busy getting ready to leave the country and mostly playing only SEIV when I have time], which they can't do unless your combat ships have eliminated any screen of defensive ships which may be present. So you order the troop ship[s] to attack, and a little screen comes up showing the relative strengths of the attacker and defender, with a variable which causes the result number to be cycling onscreen 'til you hit the attack button. It's as abstract as the space combat, and, other than bringing the numbers and researching stuff to make your troops better, there's nothing you can do to effect the outcome. But, as I noted, the focus of the game is on higher level decision making, so I guess tactical nuances would be superfluous. In the end, players always claim they want this or that detail, but, if they're all implemented, the game becomes lost under the weight of the minutia. No doubt, if you want tactical refinements, GalCiv will NOT be your cup of tea, but it does what it does very well, and it has a lot of flavor despite the tactical abstraction. I think I remember reading on the board there that a demo is planned--it may even be out now. If it's a decent demo, then downloading it and playing it would be the best way to decide if you want to shell out the bucks.