|
|
|
 |

June 8th, 2003, 08:11 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
|

June 8th, 2003, 08:21 PM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
constant related to what? the higher you go the less the gravity so it depends 
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

June 8th, 2003, 09:57 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Gravity is constant in that the rate of change of the force due to gravity is constant. 
|

June 8th, 2003, 09:59 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
I think you need to study anti-logic to quantify Fryon.
PvK
|

June 8th, 2003, 10:28 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Gravity is constant in that the rate of change of the force due to gravity is constant.
|
That only works in specialized circumstances; perhaps gravity is constant in that that G, the gravitational constant, is constant.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|

June 8th, 2003, 10:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 7
Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Well, I'm definately a 'Constant', and that's alot better than being a 'Variable' IHMO.
hmmm,.. but then again my post count is always changing, so I might be a 'variable' disguised as a 'constant'.
Come to think of it, many of the people here would best be described as 'Regulars',..
So I'm happy to announce I'm a regular guy.
Cheers!
P.S. I thought Gravity was 'relitive' not 'constant'. And if I'm not wrong it's relitive to mass, right?
[ June 08, 2003, 21:49: Message edited by: David E. Gervais ]
|

June 8th, 2003, 11:07 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Force from gravity is relative, sure:
F = G((M * m)/(d^2))
Where F is the magnitude of the force due to gravity, G is the gravitational constant (it is only sort of constant, as it depends on the units used), M and m are the two masses involved and d is the distance between the two masses. The direction is towards the other object.
Also, as Acceleration = Force/Mass, the acceleration is also relative.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|