|
|
|
|
 |
June 20th, 2003, 09:55 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion
Quote:
|
Proportions does a marveliuos job in balancing fighters and antifighter weapons. Check my proportions AIs for "anti-fighter destroyer"
|
Not really. It makes fighters too powerful, so much that they overpower ships in the same way that ships overpower fighters in the unmodded game. |
June 21st, 2003, 04:31 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,951
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion
My opinion only, In hotseat or sp against the AI, other weapons besides PD's can be used against ftrs both in unmodded and modded. My opinion is to take this ability away and only let PD's be used against ftrs. In strategic combat I'm don't think these other weapons fire on ftrs, but if they still do, then ftrs become basically useless in later parts of a game, They can't get in close enough to fire.
just some ideas Mac
__________________
just some ideas Mac
BEWARE; crochety old geezers play SE4, in between bathroom runs
Phong's Head Parking
|
June 21st, 2003, 11:19 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion
I've have looked at the data files for Proportions mod, but I have never played in it. I'll have to study it's Ship vs. Fighter combat in detail.
Chef Engineer Erax: If PDGs were kept as they are in unmodded SE IV, how strong would this Torpedo have to be to make a difference?
Wanderer: I've been leaning toward Fighter vs. Fighter as the ideal counter-fighter solution. Probably because I've seen enough of PDG vs. Fighter in unmodded SE IV.
__________________
Soulfisher
|
June 21st, 2003, 12:40 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion *DELETED*
Post deleted by Arkcon
|
June 21st, 2003, 12:41 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion *DELETED*
Post deleted by Arkcon
|
June 21st, 2003, 12:41 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion *DELETED*
Post deleted by Arkcon
|
June 21st, 2003, 12:41 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,518
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is "BattleCruiser" a relative size? -- discussion *DELETED*
Post deleted by Arkcon
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode