|
|
|
 |

July 4th, 2003, 02:22 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vilnius, Lithuania
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
We decided that LT Team requirements will be:
Intel ON
All trade ON
Can colonize all planets ON
Race points better 3000.
[ July 04, 2003, 13:28: Message edited by: Angeliux ]
__________________
Ooops. That wasn't me!
|

July 4th, 2003, 02:57 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dundas, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
Quote:
Originally posted by Angeliux:
Game features are built for playing with them, not for disabling.
|
And options buttons are included so you can turn them off. I didn't mean to start an argument, to each his own. I only add my comments here for consideration for a future Team Canada game. Personally I am not interested in playing a game were tech trading is allowed as it adds an insane level of micro management. I would also not really like mines. 5 teamates getting together and adding 500 mines to a warp point just seems cheesy. (and would really bog down the game)
|

July 4th, 2003, 03:07 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
Game Specifications
I’m Trying to be fair here.
This started out as a challenge by the LT preferable to play against one team all from one nation. It evolved into being considered the SEIV Olympics. Within 24 hours a few of the Game Specs were issued by the LT.
To be fair I need to ask the LT if:
1) They are in favor of the SE Olympics concept
2) Prefer to go back to their original challenge to play against a single team from with all players from single nation.
In the case of going with SE Olympics then there may need to be a need to compromise on the Game Specifications
In the case of reverting to the original challenge then you have a greater chance of finding one team to accept on your terms.
In the event you prefer to go with your original challenge then we can start a new thread and pick up where we left off on organizing the SE Olympics with no hard feelings.
If you would like to discuss this privately please write to:
se@windingstream.com
Note: this is not the same address as in my profile.
Thanks
[ July 04, 2003, 14:08: Message edited by: Gryphin ]
|

July 4th, 2003, 03:19 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
Second thought:
The Olympics are made up of many different types of challenges.
I could see games with and without various elements including possibly the full suite of the Gryphin Convention.
< list later >
|

July 4th, 2003, 06:07 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
I think the SE Olympics (expanding it from the LT challenge) has the most possibilities for fun.
(yeah, I'm commenting though I will follow Geo's lead of helping the USA team by NOT playing)
And, of course, another hand in the pot makes it difficult to stir properly.
But...
A few random suggestions (these are directed toward a worldwide olympic style approach):
- Smaller teams make for better moving games. I'd suggest 3 at a max and possibly 2. In the case of an odd number of players wishing to represent their country, I suppose a team of 3 or 2 would be workable. Also, this would allow for more countries who can't field a team of 4 or 5 or 6.
- Geo's comments and suggestions are very worth listening to. A team concept with a solo addition is similar to the real olympics. It would take some more management, of course. In concert with the above comment, it would also allow a person to at least represent their country if they happen to be the only one available.
- Once a format (what is and is NOT allowed) is decided upon, no variations should be allowed throughout the whole challenge.
- If it goes olympic "worldwide", then the duration could justify a small webpage. Also, while each person is representing their country, I'd suggest a small banner graphic in each person's "signature" to signify they are a representative in the Olympic match. (I'd be glad to design it for each country using their flag integrated with a simple "splash" if there was enough interest)
Anyway, just some thoughts. The thread has incredible interest and activity so I couldn't keep out of it... .
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

July 4th, 2003, 08:19 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Smaller teams make for better moving games. I'd suggest 3 at a max and possibly 2. In the case of an odd number of players wishing to represent their country, I suppose a team of 3 or 2 would be workable. Also, this would allow for more countries who can't field a team of 4 or 5 or 6.
|
Perhaps we could do two teams of 3 from those countries that can muster the manpower (USA, UK). That way more games could be run simulaneously.
[ July 04, 2003, 19:19: Message edited by: General Woundwort ]
|

July 4th, 2003, 09:37 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: not a SEIV Olympics thread anymore
Unless there is signifigant objection it will be:
ALPU till September and can then be renegotiated.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|