
August 20th, 2003, 02:48 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kailua, Hawaii
Posts: 1,860
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT - Scientific proof that there is no afterlife!
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
quote: Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
quote: Originally posted by Slick:
Why is it that people are insisting that photons have mass when all available evidence and theory are contrary to that? I just don't understand it.
SJ, nice try , but that calculation shows how much mass would be generated if the photon was completely anihilated. It does not show how much mass a photon has. This has been observed, by the way, in a process called "pair production". A photon (gamma) of at least 1.02 MeV can be transformed (E=mc^2) into an electron and a positron. There must be 2 particles due to conservation laws (momentum, spin, charge, etc.) beyond the scope of this discussion.
Slick.
|
Photons have no rest mass. At rest, they have no energy either and don't exist anymore.
The relativistic mass is a different question.
See:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...oton_mass.html (University of California site)
Edit: better link Exactly my point. Thanks SJ. *sigh* From that very article:
Quote:
The overwhelming consensus among physicists today is to say that photons are massless.
|
It also says:
Quote:
If the rest mass of the photon was non-zero, the theory of quantum electrodynamics would be "in trouble" primarily through loss of gauge invariance, which would make it non-renormalizable; also, charge-conservation would no longer be absolutely guaranteed, as it is if photons have vanishing rest-mass.
|
Which means that if a photon has mass, we basically are totally wrong about quantum electodynamics, which has been verified by numerous experiments.
Believe what you want. I give up. It no longer "matters" to me if you want to believe it or not. You don't need to attempt to convince me that you are right and I am wrong. I will continue to do my day job testing submarine reactors for the US navy at Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard. I have been doing nuclear engineering for over 13 years and I am very comfortable with my knowledge of physics. I do not have the need to have the Last word on this. I'm out of this discussion.
Slick.
[ August 20, 2003, 01:49: Message edited by: Slick ]
__________________
Slick.
|