OT: And you thought the world was sane...

[Tigbit]

Originally posted by DavidG:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tigbit:
When a kid's parent can sue a verocious dog owner for tearing his little boy apart after sending him in the yard (with signs on the fence stating clearly that the yard contains a bloodthirsty dog) to retrieve a frisbe

This guy's damn lucky he only got sued. He should be thrown in jail IMO.

---

Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

[Fyron]

Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Nobody! Go survival of the fittest!

[Tigbit]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:

---

Who's job is it to protect the stupid? After all there was clear indication of the danger. The parent should be sued for negligence and emotional damage to the owner.

Nobody! Go survival of the fittest!

---

We finally agree on something.

[Fyron]

Bound to happen eventually.

[Suicide Junkie]

City people should all get happyfluffypuppy dogs. Where the worst they do is slobber on you

[DavidG]

Yea whatever. So I guess all you guys (assume for a second you have kids) wouldn't mind if say your neighbour kept a half starved Tiger in his backyard and thought it was adequate safety to put up a "Warning Tiger!" sign on the gate.

[Fyron]

As long as he could keep it locked up, nope.