Poll: Should the Lurk Report Continue?

[General Woundwort]

Originally posted by mlmbd:
It is 'now' one third. I can not ignore one third of the community.

One third of responders to this poll. There is no real way to establish that they really represent the opinions of one-third of the community (especially since this regards the Lurk Report, designed for the less-active participants). Besides, by their own admission, they suck.

[ September 10, 2003, 13:37: Message edited by: General Woundwort ]

[Fyron]

mlmbd, you are instead going to ignore 70% of the community? I bet more than a third of the community doesn't Subscribe to the Frag newsletter. Do they stop doing it because of that?

[mlmbd]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
mlmbd, you are instead going to ignore 70% of the community? I bet more than a third of the community doesn't Subscribe to the Frag newsletter. Do they stop doing it because of that?

First, I am not ignoring anyone. Pro or Con. Second, I'm not Shrapnel. FRAG is a service that they provide. It is good, almost necessary, for them to have news letter available. Nice try though!

mlmbd

[Fyron]

It is good, almost necessary, for the Lurk Report to be available.

[DavidG]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
It is good, almost necessary, for the Lurk Report to be available.

Well start writing then.

[Baron Grazic]

A lurk report for lurkers written by the person with the most Posts here.

[Fyron]

Originally posted by Baron Grazic:
A lurk report for lurkers written by the person with the most Posts here.

That is a good a reason as any to why I should not write it, so I will second that.

It just would not be the Lurk Report if not written by Mlmbd.

[ September 18, 2003, 06:10: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]