|
|
|
 |

March 1st, 2001, 11:35 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
Yous guys is all stoopid. I happen to know, from watching the Disney movie "The Black Hole," that just inside the event horizon of black holes is a perfect place for evil scientists to have their secret laboratory. Sheesh! Get a ejerkayshun!
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
|

March 2nd, 2001, 01:15 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
The speed of light is a constant. The speed of light depends on the media through which the light is travelling... So it's a variable constant?
Magnetising frogs seems a little cruel. How much power would it take to magnetise a human? If you didn't calibrate your field properly and were relying on it to protect against 14g acceleration your spleen could remain weightless as the rest of you was spread over the acceleration couch....
|

March 2nd, 2001, 01:32 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
quote: Originally posted by jimbob55:
The speed of light is a constant. The speed of light depends on the media through which the light is travelling... So it's a variable constant?
The speed of light (actually any electromagnetic radiation: radio waves, x-rays, gamma rays, etc.) in a vacuum is a constant (roughly 3x10^8 m/s) and that is what the "c" refers to in such equations as E=mc^2.
The speed that light travels is lower than c in various media (e.g. water, atmosphere, glass).
--A Philistine
|

March 2nd, 2001, 02:39 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
quote: Originally posted by a philistine:
The speed of light (actually any electromagnetic radiation: radio waves, x-rays, gamma rays, etc.) in a vacuum is a constant (roughly 3x10^8 m/s) and that is what the "c" refers to in such equations as E=mc^2.
The speed that light travels is lower than c in various media (e.g. water, atmosphere, glass).
--A Philistine
Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't light made to go faster than c quite recently (quite odd concept, light travelling faster than the speed of light..)
|

March 2nd, 2001, 03:18 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 175
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
You're not wrong. Read the rest of this thread, and the answer you seek, you shall find.
Derek
|

March 2nd, 2001, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Theoretical Physics [OT thread]
Nobody ever said that the magnet thing would be easy.
But the field would be uniform, and it magnetizes your atoms, not organs, or whatnot. All your atoms would be pulled with the same force, as long as the field is uniform. (otherwise, that frog would have been mush)
[This message has been edited by suicide_junkie (edited 02 March 2001).]
__________________
Things you want:
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|