It's time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I

Joachim · #1 November 27th, 2003, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Alneyan:
Yes Joachim, I agree with default settings and no Ancient. Would Intelligence be allowed or not? (I don't recall if it is allowed or disabled in the KOTH settings) Feel free to bet against your defeat, but I for one don't have a clue about the outcome of the game.

Yep, intel is in. Will upload emp now.

geoschmo · #2 November 28th, 2003, 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Asmala:
Cool game description, but I guess it required some work:

Nov 27, 2003 5:03:52 AM EET
Game description updated (geoschmo)

Yes Asmala, yours was the pilot. The others won't have all those.

This was the first time I had experimented with iframe tags. I think it worked out rather well.

Geoschmo

Slynky · #3 November 27th, 2003, 03:27 PM

Slynky vs Lord Chane: Game Settings

Standard KOTH with these changes:

(1) One GOOD starting planet;
(2) No intel
(3) No ancient

Tks, Geo!

eorg · #4 November 27th, 2003, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Slynky:
RexTorres vs georgig: RexTorres (though I wonder a bit)

don't wonder - he killed me twice in unicup tournament and once in koth - all three 1:1 games
and slynky i'll face you when i lose right? :-P

rex - settings please?

Quote:

Originally posted by geoschmo:
If you don't know why I stuck you in this game I must have made a mistake.

yes geo - big mistake it is :-P

Slynky · #5 November 27th, 2003, 06:48 PM

Yeah, georgig, it's a bit dismaying to me as I look at my positioning. To do well at all, I will need to win against Lord Chane (admittedly, I think, more possible that what would follow...gulp), and then Rex, and then Asmala. Yuck. I'd rather have been in the lower 8

.

Even worse, anyone losing the first game can do no better than 9th place...if I understand things.

geoschmo · #6 November 27th, 2003, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Slynky:
Even worse, anyone losing the first game can do no better than 9th place...if I understand things.

That is correct.

Edit: Hmmm, maybe that isn't right though. The person that loses the first game and wins the next three shouldn't place below the guy who wins the first game and loses teh next three. I have to think abtou this for a bit.

[ November 27, 2003, 19:31: Message edited by: geoschmo ]

Alneyan · #7 November 27th, 2003, 09:37 PM

It depends, if this individual wins against Asmala but losts his three other games, he deserves to be rated higher than the player who losts his first game but wins the three others.

More seriously, I would agree with Slynky, although I am not sure how you could tweak the brackets. (Except for a score rating of some sort that is)