|
|
|
 |

November 27th, 2003, 03:27 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Slynky vs Lord Chane: Game Settings
Standard KOTH with these changes:
(1) One GOOD starting planet;
(2) No intel
(3) No ancient
Tks, Geo!
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

November 27th, 2003, 04:42 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: seiv.pbw.cc
Posts: 115
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
RexTorres vs georgig: RexTorres (though I wonder a bit)
|
don't wonder - he killed me twice in unicup tournament and once in koth - all three 1:1 games
and slynky i'll face you when i lose right? :-P
rex - settings please?
Quote:
Originally posted by geoschmo:
If you don't know why I stuck you in this game I must have made a mistake.
|
yes geo - big mistake it is :-P
__________________
'artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity'
|

November 27th, 2003, 06:48 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Yeah, georgig, it's a bit dismaying to me as I look at my positioning. To do well at all, I will need to win against Lord Chane (admittedly, I think, more possible that what would follow...gulp), and then Rex, and then Asmala. Yuck. I'd rather have been in the lower 8  .
Even worse, anyone losing the first game can do no better than 9th place...if I understand things.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

November 27th, 2003, 09:24 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Even worse, anyone losing the first game can do no better than 9th place...if I understand things.
|
That is correct.
Edit: Hmmm, maybe that isn't right though. The person that loses the first game and wins the next three shouldn't place below the guy who wins the first game and loses teh next three. I have to think abtou this for a bit.
[ November 27, 2003, 19:31: Message edited by: geoschmo ]
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

November 27th, 2003, 09:37 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
It depends, if this individual wins against Asmala but losts his three other games, he deserves to be rated higher than the player who losts his first game but wins the three others.
More seriously, I would agree with Slynky, although I am not sure how you could tweak the brackets. (Except for a score rating of some sort that is)
|

November 27th, 2003, 09:55 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Ok, I adjusted it a bit. I had to kind of make it up cause normally with a bracket like this you lose one and you are out.
Now if you lose the first game and win the next three you end up with 5th place for the tournament. Below the other 3-1 players that won their first game, but above the 2-2 and 1-3 players that won their first game.
I think this is a fair system. Of course it only matters for tournament purposes. The real question is how many points in the Ratings system will you earn or lose for the tournament. And that cannot be predicted without knowing for sure who you will face. And could be affected by non-tournament games that you finish at the same time, so I can't really use that for a tourney result.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|

November 27th, 2003, 11:31 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: It\'s time for a new Tournament...Ratings Bash I
Slynky -vs- Lord Chane: Year 2400.1
No sign of the varmit yet.
(OK, so that was a boring game update. But, hey, the game is afoot!)
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|