|
|
|
 |

December 5th, 2003, 11:10 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
quote: Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
Considering how cheap armor is for its effectiveness, I'd say its not weak. Aside from the need to repair after battle, of course..
|
Armor is only a viable alternative to standard shields when PPBs are in use. Otherwise... it is too weak. It can help a little against mines, where shields are useless, but mine sweepers are really cheap anyways, so that is not much of a benefit. Sure, shield depleters can do a lot of damage to shields, but you need a few of them to take out shielding on bigger ships. Use Armor III instead of Phased Shields V to prevent SD damage, and you will find your ships die much more easily. All I am saying is that armor should be a better alternative to shields than it is now. It just dead ends rather early (not counting the ECM armors and such, which are fairly weak in the hit point area). Armor III is better than any shield up to III, and much easier to research than Phased III. It does end too earlier, but remember I said for the cost.
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

December 5th, 2003, 11:33 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
I think you missed the point... you are not at all disagreeing with anything I said.  My suggestion was to provide a real alternative to just using pure shields after a while. Adding more levels of armor can do that.
|

December 5th, 2003, 11:36 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
phew, I am halfway through the stock balance mod thread, *** you guys can waffle on...

__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

December 6th, 2003, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
Why thank you. 
|

December 10th, 2003, 09:11 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
opinions!
do you think that PDC should be changed?
I will be changeing the fighters defencive bonuses with engines and afterburners. but I need to work it in with the PDC if I am going to change them aswell.
so,
are pdc to good at shooting down missiles?
if so how much so, and what do you think needs to be done to change it.
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

December 11th, 2003, 05:29 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
I like the change of making 2 different PDC components, one that targets fighters and another that targets missiles, both at 20kT.
|

December 11th, 2003, 08:11 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Strawberry Vanilla MOD
I thought about that when I saw it in adamant. interesting idea, but I think it would be changeing the flavour a little to much...
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|