Game of the Year for 2003/Good & Bad

[Atrocities]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Loser:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Worst game is tied for that Civ 3 expansion (because it is part of Civ 3) and MOO3.

Ouch. At least Civ III ws playable.

[edit: 2 != 3]

---

So? There are a lot of horrid games that are "playable." And besides, part of the problem with Civ 3 is the evil marketing BS they pulled with it, splitting the game into 3 parts so they could milk more money without adding ANY meaningful features in any of the expansions. Civ 3 + 2 expansions at their best almost equal Civ 2 Gold at its worst, save some really stupid things like removing the hit point/firepower system of Civ 2 that helped tremendously over Civ 1. No comparison at all to Civ 2 ToT.

---

Fyron and I are on the same page when it comes to Civ 3. In fact I think it was how we started talking. You should do a search for Civ 3, Civ III or something like that.