|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 01:47 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Oslo, Norway 
						Posts: 1,030
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 Didn't save the game, but it only takes 5-10 minutes to do such a test again. Not sure exactly what I should send though as its just a small map with one Crystalline race with a bunch of fighters and another race with one ship with a SD. 
Not even sure I am unhappy with the result either. Crystalline is already the strongest racial in my opinion (yup, at least as strong a religious), and 60 extra points pr fighter would have been over the top   
				__________________Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 02:18 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Australia 
						Posts: 538
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 Incorparating ETLs on fighters in some way or perhaps even a variation effect is a good idea to explore - give MM all the results you find so it can be worked with. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 02:38 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Ohio, USA 
						Posts: 4,323
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 The combination of Crystalline Armor and the shield-boosting "Energy Transmission Lense' does give Crystalline races a very strong defensive advantage. Even though the Shard Cannon is relatively weak offensively once shields are developed a few levels, it's so hard to destroy crystalline armor equipped ships that they are very likely to get the chance to exploit their special weapon.
 I think that Temporal is about as strong offensively as Crystalline is defensively, though. The special weapons available to Temporal races are very nasty. If you can afford the points, taking both of these traits together would be truly evil -- if you get the chance to research all those tech levels.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 02:45 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Australia 
						Posts: 538
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 You know combining say a branch of the crystaline defensiveness and the offensive temporal branchs is an idea for tech tree expansion.  Perhaps offensive races could be limited to research only a certain shiled tech level or have shields weakened by 20% ?
 Its good to have these variants as it makes the game interesting, i find that the cyrstaline and psychic combination is good - ie convert with heavily defended ships that are hard to destroy.
 
 ETL and perhaps temporal techs could be on fighters but with some restricitons.  Ie perhaps bigger size sacrificing movement of sheilding ?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 03:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Oxford, UK 
						Posts: 2,592
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 
	Actually, it is notQuote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Baron Munchausen: ... it's so hard to destroy crystalline armor equipped ships that they are very likely to get the chance to exploit their special weapon.
 
 ...
 |   The idea is a "Sandwich Battery" (copy right by Oleg, 2002  ): 
 Normally, people put several SD first on ship and then normal weapons, say APB. But when fighting CA, rearrange weapons in this way: SD,APB,SD,APB...
 When SD hits ship with CA, it saps shields but shields DO NOT regenerate from damage here.
 
 It leaves CA ship naked to APB hit. Whatever shields are regenerated after APB hit are then removed by SD, etc. CA becomes a basically standard armor !
 Notice that you don't even need to waste space using mounts on SD, decent SD with normal mounts take care of 6-9 CAIII
 
 All together you get CA piercing weapon wich is only 30% bigger then large mounted APB (even better on larger ships)
				__________________It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 04:04 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Oslo, Norway 
						Posts: 1,030
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 Great idea Oleg, and coupled with a Talisman it would be devastating.  
Not sure how well it will work with a more normal 50 – 70 % to hit chance though.
 
Hmmmm. Time for some more testing   
				__________________Never trust a cop with rubber gloves.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				February 12th, 2004, 05:17 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2003 
						Posts: 59
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: energy transmition lens and fighters. 
 WOW, what a nice idea, thanx Oleg. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |